MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1559971104

Creating the Rogue Hero: Literary Devices in the Picaresque Novels of Martin Amis, Richard Russo, Michael Chabon, Jonathan Safran Foer, and Steve Tesich

2007· article· en· W1559971104 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. P. McCulloch

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational fiction review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHEROArt historyAlleyArtHistoryLiterature
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

What is it about The Catcher in Rye that makes me wish I had written it? Perhaps I should start with fact that Holden Caulfield is as charming as anyone I've ever met--on or off page. Why is it that whenever I reread Catcher, I never want it to end? I find myself slowing down and savoring lines. I find myself laughing in all same places, and, yes, crying in all same places too. I find myself saying goddam this, goddam that. Suddenly everything's lousy. Lousy--like that woman on train whose hand was lousy with rocks. I just want to hole up with Holden in that creepy hotel and gang up on Maurice, bellhop-pimp. I want to head down to Village with him and get drunk at a jazz bar. I want to go home with him to his parents' apartment on Park Avenue and watch his little sister Phoebe sleep. I want to know exactly what that red hunting hat looks like anyway. Maybe even try it on. I almost find myself worrying about ducks--where they're going to go in winter when ponds freeze over. It is novels like Catcher that make me want to be a writer--that make me want to try to create a little world that no one will ever want to leave. There are other novels that I never want to leave either--The Great Gatsby for one--but ones I find myself gravitating toward more than any others are picaresques such as Catcher in Rye--particularly ones that do a good job of balancing humor and pathos of rogue. It's not just because picaresque heroes are more fun than other characters that I love them. It's not just dissolute behavior that I find so appealing. And it's not just dubious company they keep or adventures they embark upon that I find so satisfying. All of these things make for a pretty good story. But what makes them really worthwhile is romantic sense of sadness and futility that haunts them all--their honest recognition of their own shortcomings that gives them emotional weight and makes them resonate. Disappointingly, like young Hal in Henry IV, Part L who eventually deserts Falstaff, all rogue heroes must grow up and assume a certain amount of responsibility. Often they settle down, give up their aimless wandering, and find a home. Unfortunately, settling down can mean letting go of the impossible dream. We wish their peregrinations would never end, and so by nature picaresque novel, whose trappings are ribald excess, is also fraught with a deep sense of loss and sorrow. We must not forget, however, that what makes picaresque so much fun are comic possibilities of an errant hero in pursuit of something impossible. He is at once noble and pathetic, a delight to spend time with and to laugh at, and heroic in his blindness to humbling reality that confronts him wherever he goes. The picaresque novel predates English novel by more than a hundred years. Of course, best-known picaresque novel, Spanish or otherwise, is Cervantes' Don Quixote. While rise of Bildungsroman and realistic novel may have led to its decline, picaresque is still very much alive. In my opinion, there is only so much stark realism readers care to consume. Part of reason Dickens's Romantic novels outsell those of his contemporaries and always will is that they are populated by so many unforgettable picaresque characters. Another reason is quite simply that people want to laugh. We prefer things as they should be to way things really are. Dickens, of course, blends both picaresque with narrative romance, while Eliot and Thackeray give them strong doses of reality. Because satire comprises a major part of picaresque writer's landscape, he must balance humor with sadness; otherwise, his work will either prove too frivolous or too hard-nosed--either way lacking power to move us. While picaresque is best known for its episodic nature and corrupt society that makes rogue more appealing than those he opposes, what really interests me are ways in which writers are able to convey both humor and pathos of rogue--that is, literary devices writers employ to maintain that sense of poignancy and humor. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,909
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,623

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational fiction reviewMême sujetAmerican and British Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207