“The Tale of the Tribe and the Company Town”: What We Can Learn About the Workings of Whiteness in the Pacific Northwest
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
3 For reasons that readers will discern, the author is not at liberty to identify the locale, communities, and actors involved.4 It is a kind of tale that Keith Aoki, with his uncanny ability to make connections others often missed, would have appreciated for many reasons, and one that he helped me to discern, scrutinize, appreciate, and articulate.Keith's particular genius was seeing and showing us how situations that at first might appear to be nothing more than anachronistic, locale-bound conflicts have much to teach us about dynamics of white political, legal, economic, and cultural activity, both historic and contemporary, and how these dynamics bear on local and regional conditions of immigration and in-migration by persons of color.It is a kind of tale that calls forth the cross-conversational modes and methodologies of narrating, analyzing, drawing out meanings, advancing questions and insights, noting ironies, and offering conclusions and recommendations informed by critical race theory, cultural geography, critical regionalism, state and local government law, and translocalism, all of which Keith brought to bear and directly shaped in legal scholarship.T 2012] "The Tale of the Tribe and the Company Town": 1275 What We Can Learn About the Workings of Whiteness in the Pacific Northwest Cascadia, 5 as it is now sometimes called 6 ).Having presented the tale, and having worked to surface and explore facets of past factors, present conditions, and future possibilities that it implicates, the Article concludes with five insights and a few hopes.I TERMS, CONCEPTS, AND MEANINGS: A FEW WORDS Plato called rhetoric "the art of winning the soul by discourse," 7 and Aristotle, his greatest student, called it "the faculty of discovering in any particular case all the available means of persuasion." 8Whether the methods of persuasive rhetoric happen to lie in making appeals to reason, emotion, or character, the point is that terms, concepts, and meanings are profoundly rhetorical-that is, their aims are to appeal to and persuade identified and identifiable audiences.9Anxieties over techniques, strategies, and aims, especially as arising from devotees to specific conceptions of knowledge and truth, have contributed to equating "rhetoric" with "sophistry" 10 (or "spindoctoring," 11 by contemporary phraseology).Yet to say that terms, concepts, and meanings are rhetorical is simply to say that they are parts of language practices, and as such they do more than define and describe; they also reflect and shape intricate, often latent and unruly, interrelations-political, economic, ideological, cultural, 5 See Carl Abbott, Competing Cascadias: Imagining a Region over Four Decades, URBAN WEST (2010), available at http://theurbanwest.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07 /Competing-Cascadias.pdf.6 See, e.g., Cascadia Flag, PEOPLE'S REPUBLICS, http://thepeoplespdx.com/shop-prop-gear/cascadia (last visited May 24, 2012) (proclaiming "Cascadia" as self-identification and decrying "Pacific Northwest" as identification based on "an Atlantic centered map" and imposed by "Atlantic empires").This website also describes "Pacific Northwesterners" as "remain[ing] a nameless object or second thought to the power centers of Washington DC and Ottowa [sic]," and the site analogizes individuals "remaining the Pacific Northwest" to "being an object much akin to a man of color being called 'boy.'"Id. 7 Andrea A. Lunsford, Some Definitions of Rhetoric, STANFORD UNIV., http://www .stanford.edu/dept/english/courses/sites/lunsford
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,020 | 0,027 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».