MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1560990345

Making Environmental Sustainability for Transportation Infrastructure a Reality: The Environmental Enhancement Fund in British Columbia

2007· article· en· W1560990345 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leonard Sielecki

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStewardship (theology)SustainabilityGovernment (linguistics)BusinessPublic administrationEnvironmental stewardshipChristian ministryFinanceEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementPolitical sciencePoliticsEconomicsGeography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The award winning Environmental Enhancement Fund developed by the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation demonstrates environmentally sustainable transportation projects can be achieved through innovative private and public partnerships.\n The award winning Environmental Enhancement Fund (EEF) was established by the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation (BCMoT) in 2004. The fund was conceived by the Ministry’s Executive to promote environmental stewardship in the Ministry and foster partnerships with outside agencies.\n EEF was initiated as a one year program in 2004, and extended in 2005. In 2006, as a result of its outstanding success and support from other government agencies and non-government organizations (NGO’s), the EFF was made a permanent program by BCMoT. The EEF supports BCMoT’s commitment to the British Columbia Government’s goal to lead the world in sustainable environmental management, with the best air and water quality, and the best fisheries management.\n The EEF is an innovative program that has helped BCMoT highway projects ensure:\n 1. High benchmarks for environmental stewardship are set and achieved;\n 2. Environmental Best Management Practices (BMP’s) are more results driven and performance based;\n 3. Partnerships with provincial and federal agencies, First Nations and NGO’s are established to ensure environ¬mental sensitive areas and habitats are protected and/or restored, and function on a sustainable basis; and\n 4. Goodwill, trust and positive working relationships are established and sustained with provincial and federal agencies, First Nations, NGO’s, and private landowners.\n Working closely with other provincial and federal agencies, First Nations, NGO’s, including the Nature Trust, Ducks Unlimited, the Pacific Salmon Foundation, the Land Conservancy of British Columbia, and private landowners, BCMoT has been involved in over 100 EEF-supported projects throughout British Columbia.\n EEF projects fall under four general categories of on-ground and in-stream environmental projects that directly en¬hance, restore and/or protect fish and wildlife resources:\n 1. Fish passage improvements and restoration at highway stream crossings through culvert retrofits and replacements, enabling salmon and trout to return to their former levels in previously accessible habitat.\n 2. Strategic and timely acquisition of environmentally sensitive properties for conservation purposes and protection in perpetuity, with property owned and managed by non-Ministry agencies, NGO’s or other organizations.\n 3. Fish and wildlife habitat enhancement works, in partnership with provincial and federal environmental agencies and NGO’s, to: construct salmon and trout rearing habitat and spawning channels; establish water storage to create wetlands or wetted habitat and to augment low summer streamflows; increase habitat complexing and daylighting; restore highway footprint impacts; and enhance riparian areas.\n 4. Other fish and wildlife projects: including restoration of wild fish populations or wild fish transplants; and wildlife crash mitigation by relocating rare or endangered species, such as Roosevelt Elk, to more remote areas to establish new herds or enlarge existing ones.\n Many projects have significant spin-off benefits for water and/or air quality. The projects also provide a capital environ¬mental return and are linked directly to the BCMoT’s highway infrastructure.\n Since it inception, the EFF has garnered numerous accolades and awards from Federal and Provincial agencies and high profile NGO’s. In 2005, Ducks Unlimited Canada awarded its most prestigious award, the Platinum Award, to BCMoT for environmental mitigation land donations associated with Ministry projects, such as the Vancouver Island Highway Project. Also in 2005, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) presented industry awards to fourteen BCMoT staff involved with highway fish passage restoration projects in the Province’s northwest. In 2006, the EEF won the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) Environmental Achievement Award. The TAC award, coveted by transportation agencies throughout Canada, provides national recognition of the importance and need of the transportation sector to continue protecting and enhancing the environment.\n The EEF consistently delivers high value, tangible environmental projects linked to the highway infrastructure, in a cost-effective manner through private and public partnerships that restore and conserve British Columbia’s natural resources. Given its success, the EEF model can be adopted by transportation agencies and municipalities to foster environmentally sustainable transportation projects.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,104
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,756

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,003
Communication savante0,0120,003
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Même sujetEnvironmental and Social Impact AssessmentsTravaux en français237 207