MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1561335735

SHAKSPER Roundtable on Intentions: The Origins of the Collaboration with Style1

2010· article· en· W1561335735 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hardy M. Cook

Notice bibliographique

RevueStyle · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPerformative utteranceThe InternetSociologyMedia studiesPublic relationsLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceComputer scienceArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Now in its twenty-first year of serving the academy, SHAKSPER is an edited and moderated, international, e-mail distribution list for discussion among Shakespearean researchers, instructors, students, and anyone sharing their academic interests and concerns. The SHAKSPER digests are delivered, archived, and managed with L-Soil's LISTSERV[R] software. In addition to the regular mailings to subscribers, anyone can use the Internet to access the archives and the list's other materials from the SHAKSPER Web site . The list's more than one thousand members have enrolled from sixty-eight countries; they include prominent Shakespearean textual scholars and bibliographers, editors and critics, as well as university, college, and community-college professors, high-school teachers, undergraduate and graduate students, actors, theatre professionals, authors, poets, playwrights, librarians, computer scientists, lawyers, doctors, retirees, and other interested participants. SHAKSPER endeavors to emphasize the scholarly discourse by providing the opportunity for the formal exchange of ideas through queries and responses regarding literary, critical, textual, theoretical, and performative topics and issues. Announcements of conferences, calls for papers, seminars, lectures, symposia, job openings, the publication of books, the availability of online and print articles, Internet databases and resources, journal contents, and performances and festivals are regular features as are assessments of scholarly books, past and present theatrical productions, and Shakespeare and Shakespeare-inspired films as well as citations and discussions of culture references to Shakespeare and his works. SHAKSPER also provides occasion for spontaneous informal discussion, eavesdropping, peer review, and a sense of belonging to a worldwide scholarly community. Besides the archive of past discussions, the SHAKSPER Web site includes Selected Guide to Shakespeare on the Internet, an international directory of Shakespearean institutions, organizations, libraries, and journals, and a bibliography of poems, novels, plays, and films inspired by Shakespeare and his works, and much more. The Origins of the SHAKSPER Roundtable In the early 1970s, the U.S. military developed the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET), a bombproof, distributed packet-switching network, which went worldwide with the Department of Defense's connecting ARPANET supercomputers to other supercomputers at University College in London and at the Royal Radar Establishment in Norway. As proficiency with computer applications began to spread from the military to scientists and librarians and eventually to academics in other disciplines, e-mail was generally the entry-level Internet application adopted by most. E-mail could be archived and organized on electronic bulletin boards with Usenet newsgroups being generally employed for messages of a mundane nature while listserv software became the preferred method for distributing messages among members with more scholarly or focused interests. In the early 1990s, hypertext, a protocol for information distribution that embedded links in a text to connect it to other texts, was developed by the European Laboratory for Particle Physics (CERN) and became the basis for such graphical interfaces as the then popular Mosaic program, transforming the Internet into the World Wide Web and thoroughly changing computing by opening it to the general public, profoundly changing the users on and the content of the Internet. I initially became interested in the potential of academic listservs when I attended a panel at the December 1989 MLA convention in Washington, D.C., and heard Willard McCarty, then of the University of Toronto, deliver his paper Humanist: Lessons from a Global Electronic Seminar. A few months later in April 1990 at the SAA Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, I met Kenneth Steele, a graduate student from the University of Toronto who had been working with McCarty. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,071

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,025
Communication savante0,0180,008
Science ouverte0,0020,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueStyleMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207