MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1563280105 · doi:10.2307/25606088

Feminist Fields: Ethnographic Insights

2002· article· en· W1563280105 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jasmin Habib, Rae Bridgman, Sally Cole, Heather Howard

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnthropologica · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEthnographySociologyAnthropologyGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rae Bridgman, Sally Cole and Heather Howard-Bobiwash (eds.), Peterborough: Broadview Press, 1999, 314 pages.Reviewer: Jasmin HabibFeminist Fields: Ethnographic Insights edited by Canadian anthropologists Rae Bridgman, Sally Cole and Heather Howard-Bobiwash and published by the independent Broadview Press presents essays about feminism, women in anthropology and feminist practices in the In the introduction, the editors write that they set out to attract young and old practitioners and to make the text friendly to lay and undergraduate readers by encourag[ing] authors to enliven their texts with stories and first person narratives to bring tangled theoretical concepts to (p. 2).Though in many ways this is an uneven text, in most cases the writers accomplished their editors goals. The best essays offer exceptional and are accessible, reflexive, and most importantly for someone reading this text for its methodological contributions, (ethnographic insights being the subtitle of the book), they challenge feminists to rethink the study of gender in anthropological terms. The book covers a range of topics in 17 essays, including the role of women and feminism in academia; the problematic of women's practices; the changing social and political economies and their effects on women; the frontiers of women's organizing and political practices; and reflexive feminism in the field. This review will focus on the best of these essays, reflecting my interest in feminist research methodologies.Most impressive was Home has Always been Hard for Me by Susan Frolick who chooses to situate her own privileged mobility in order to gain insight into what can be the disorienting and demanding experience of homelessness and single-motherhood. Of one woman's struggles, she writes how: She politicized as an impossible space wherein she has had an ongoing struggle to find and make a place for herself and her son against barriers of poverty, abuse, homophobic and sexist discrimination, and her own inability to overcome the politics and weightiness of home work. (p. 91)Through her vulnerability as a lesbian, as well as through her poverty, Raine mediates her understanding of home--as a secure place of belonging--as a reality she has never been able to afford, symbolically or materially, nor likely will in the future (p 92).In her chapter on homelessnes, Rae Bridgman adds to her analysis a reflection on the vulnerabilities of the subjects of any ethnographic project, something feminist sociologists who were at the forefront of the development of feminist research methodologies wrote about in the early 1980s but it seems anthropologists still need to be reminded of.On the politics and problematics of representing--in anthropological and feminist terms--women's practices, Parin A. Dossa's chapter entitled Narrating Embodied Lives: Muslim Women on the Coast of Kenya begins with this provocative statement: My purpose is to suggest a frame that goes beyond the listening-telling paradigm of life narratives (Ong, 1995), that seek to address the crisis of representation in feminist/subalternist anthropology, but ultimately, remain confined to capturing words (p. 157)....[D]espite my painstaking efforts to listen to women's stories, I was missing out on a critical element: images of women's bodies at work, engaged in aesthetic and creative endeavours, on the move and in positions of repose. The telling and listening paradigm became inadequate.... (p. 158)Dossa returns to do field work in the village of Lamu in her home region, though as she writes, not as a native: [a] 'native' stance would be pretentious as my advanced education in the West and my profession as an academic have created cultural and class differences that need to be taken into account (p. 160). In the paper, she show[s] that there is no simple equation between veiling/seclusion and women's oppression and lack of opportunities. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,050

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,013
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,010
Communication savante0,0080,008
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,108
Tête enseignante GPT0,406
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnthropologicaMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207