Notice bibliographique
Résumé
* Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P Jones, and Ethan Thompson, eds. New York, NY: New York University Press, 2009. 283 pp. $70 hbk. $23 pbk. Humor is deUcate to dissect. If you explain a joke, it may cease to be funny and the humor falls apart. But taking apart satire leads to understanding humor's critical capacity to attack and disarm its subjects. This is especially true when it comes to the politicaUy and socially oriented humor addressed in Satire TV. Dissecting satire - and similar humor tropes such as parody and irony - requires careful work. And the editors as well as authors of this collection do just that, working to understand satire as a form of critique, as challenger to the status quo of news and politics, and as contributor to and civic discourses. The collection brings together scholars who know their objects of study weU, from The Daily Show and the complicated Stephen Colbert persona, to a slew of American comedy variety shows (Saturday Night Live, The Smothers Brothers), Canadian and British humor, participation via YouTube, and a sampling of Comedy Central programming specializing in subversive satire (to a point, as Haggins notes in regards to Chappelle's Show and its relationship to corporate priorities and audience responses). These authors draw on tools of analysis such as Bakhtin's carnivalesque framework to dissect humor (Thompson and South Park), rhetoric and discourse to situate humor within the (Morrealle and Jon Stewart), and the construction of identity through humor (Tinic and the Canadian comic Rick Mercer). Overall, the collection is a significant contribution to the study of satire in the televisual form - an area of scholarship that is in need of more perspectives, frameworks, and analyses given the proliferation of satire, subversive humor, and parody across and the Internet. Indeed, the editors argue that satire TV is a genre just like any other, with its own style, aesthetic, purposes, as well as being a genre that can facilitate a space on for political culture to play out. The editors bring much to the conversation. Gray teaches media and cultural studies at Wisconsin-Madison and is author of two other books on TV. Jones is at Old Dominion, and produced two books on new television and HBO. Thompson is as assistant communication professor at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi. Their book is organized into four sections, grouping a set of articles considering the different satirical opportunities that exist in network, post-network, and postmodern contexts, a selection exclusively focusing on the favorite sons of satire - Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert - a grouping that addresses the deconstruction and reconstruction of figures and discourse within the realm of humor, and lastly a refreshing segment tackling the limits of satire. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».