MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1563821167

"I Am Not a Disorder": The Chrysalis Community-Based Treatment Program

2007· article· en· W1563821167 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Margo Rivera

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueCommunity Health and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOppressionSociologyContext (archaeology)Gender studiesSocial workPovertyRacismSexual abusePsychologyPoison controlSuicide preventionPoliticsMedicinePolitical scienceLawHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction In 1980, I took a job as a social worker in a Children's Aid Society treatment centre in Toronto. Within this context, I began to meet women and children who had been subjected to the most brutal forms of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, among them a woman who suffered from a severe case of what we then called and now call identity disorder. I knew I was over my head trying to help this woman, but the psychiatric facility from which she was referred to our program made it clear that they had no intention of taking her back. So I decided to return to school to learn more about how to do this work that was suddenly much more complex than I had previously experienced, and I enrolled in the Community Psychology program at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education in the University of Toronto. I had grown up in New York City and Long Island and spent much of my free time as an adolescent in two of the most marginalized areas of the city, the Bowery and Spanish Harlem, operating a clothing room for homeless people and caring for abandoned babies. Then I moved to Toronto where I was a social worker in communities where I saw the same poverty, racism, and class oppression. I came to postgraduate studies wanting to know more about people's intrapsychic struggles but also extremely aware of the ways in which their environment profoundly affects who they are and can become. Community Psychology, the branch of psychology concerned with person-environment interactions and the ways society impacts upon individual and community functioning, was, therefore, a good fit for me. Social injustice related to race and class were central to my awareness from the time I was a teenager in the early 1960s, traveling from one end of Manhattan to another. It was only in the early 1980s, when I encountered on a daily basis women and children who had been repeatedly brutalized, physically and sexually, by men, that I began to see a glimpse of gender and sexuality as sites of oppression. Dr. Jeri Wine was one of my professors in the Community Psychology department at OISE, and she opened my eyes to a feminist perspective on psychology that has stood me in good stead in my work for the next 20 years. I had signed on for a master's degree, but Jeri convinced me that there was no reason why I should not do a doctorate as well. She supervised my dissertation committee with a light hand, recognizing my capacity to do what I needed to do in my own way. With her support, I finished my dissertation expeditiously and went back to the complicated and endlessly interesting project of reaching out to people who have endured the extremes of oppressive socialization to a patriarchal society, those with severe post-traumatic dissociative conditions. A few years after I graduated from OISE, I was invited to join the Department of Psychiatry at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. As well as teaching and supervising the psychiatry residents and other students, I developed a treatment program for individuals who had been diagnosed in the psychiatric system with personality disorders. This article describes a few aspects of this program, which has operated for 11 years within the dominant culture of a university hospital and at the same time attempts every day to subvert some of the most basic values of that culture. I continue to be grateful to Jeri Wine for giving me both the encouragement and the space to build the feminist perspective and community psychology knowledge base that made creating and sustaining this innovative program possible. As well as the direct contribution she made to my life, she has also enriched the lives of all the individuals who have been touched, stirred up, empowered, and healed through the Chrysalis Program. The Chrysalis Program Feminist therapists operate within multiple realities, and the ability to live with uncomfortable contradictions in order to make ourselves useful to suffering people is a particularly feminist feat. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,018
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,887
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0180,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,331
Tête enseignante GPT0,577
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetCommunity Health and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207