MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W156383151

Practice success: the challenge of recruiting and retaining technicians.

2002· article· en· W156383151 sur OpenAlexaffabout
John Tait

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of GuelphGuelph General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTechnicianBusinessMarketingService (business)AttractivenessWork (physics)Public relationsEngineeringPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Much attention has been paid lately to the tight labor market for veterinary associates and even tighter market for associates willing to purchase practices. Often overlooked, but just as critical to the success of any practice and its attractiveness as a potential target for purchase, are the qualifications, continuity, and longevity of the staff, and the market for those individuals. Practices that excel need performance, service, and commitment from their staff. Practitioners will recognize that one of the individuals whom they depend on most is their registered veterinary technician (RVT), or veterinary technician (VT). These individuals play multiple roles in supporting both the clinical and patient care activities of the practice, as well as in client service, marketing, and facility and inventory maintenance. Today's market for RVTs and challenges for newly graduated technicians are similar to those facing new veterinary graduates: limited numbers of spaces in schools; a wide open job market in many areas where the number of available employment positions exceeds the number of individuals available to fill them; high debt loads, when compared with starting wages; an expanding wealth of knowledge; more sophisticated equipment; demanding clients; and the need to work as part of a team. Practice owners and managers often face the same challenges in recruiting and retaining RVTs as they do in recruiting and retaining associate veterinarians. So what are the keys to recruiting and retaining standout technicians in a competitive market? Employee candidates can come from either a pool of currently employed technicians or new graduates. Many student technicians will have obtained jobs prior to graduation; therefore, direct recruiting at the school level or even prior to graduation by offering summer or co-op positions helps to expose the candidates to your practice. Guest lectures or interviews held at the school reduce the need for the graduate to travel, so that convenience may stimulate greater interest. According to Dr. Irene Moore, Program Coordinator at Ridgetown College in Ontario, the average graduate carries a debt load of more than $20,000 and often has to relocate close to home for financial reasons alone. Relocation assistance packages, through either financial provisions or home locater services, can help to ease the cost of relocating and attract interested technicians. Direct advertising in provincial or local newsletters, in journals, and at conferences is traditional, but effective, as long as the advertisements are through a channel or in advertising media directed to the technician, not the veterinarian. Networking and informal communications often lead to the movement of experienced technicians from one location to another. Other employees in your practice, sometimes with an attached incentive to refer another prospective employee, can prove a valuable source, as can industry representatives who visit your practice. While recruitment strategies are important to attract the right individual for your practice, retention strategies are critical to providing stability and continuity. While 90% of RVT graduates head into private practice following graduation, only 50% of them are still in private practice 5 years after graduation (Kim Hilborn, Ontario Association Veterinary Technicians, personal communication). In 2002, the Ontario Association of Veterinary Technicians and the Ontario Veterinary Medical Association will embark on a study to determine why technicians are leaving private practice employment in such high numbers. Regardless, there are some suggested and proven general strategies towards improving retention: Offer a competitive salary and benefits. Over 70% of RVTs in Canada earn between $21 000 and $30 000 annually (Dr. Irene Moore, personal communication). Staying competitive in retaining technicians means staying competitive with the marketplace wage in your area. To protect profit margins, many practice owners are turning to incentive or bonus programs that are based on the achievement of specific revenue or cost control goals over which technicians or other support staff members have some control. Benefits that interest technicians are not significantly different from those that interest veterinary associates, including opportunities for continuing education; payment of association fees; veterinary care for their animals; travel allowances, if multiple facilities are involved; sick time; uniform allowances; flex-time scheduling; and health and insurance plans, if available. Include your technicians in discussions and value their abilities. Technicians feel that they are part of the healthcare delivery team, that they are not simply veterinary assistants, and that every effort should be made to have them accessible to clients and to visibly credit them for contributing to the patient's care. Supporting this suggestion is the premise that, within allowable provincial Veterinarian's Act regulations, technicians will be given responsibility and authority over patient care and specific areas of the hospital operation, including such areas as staff training, inventory management, client follow-ups, etc. Allow your technicians the opportunity to grow. Delegation is an important aspect of survival for practice owners or managers when they are seeking some relief from their multitude of responsibilities, and an important aspect of intrinsic satisfaction and motivation for employees. Progres- sive or increasing delegation becomes important for retention, as simply performing the same clinical tasks or saying and doing the same thing repeatedly loses it luster after a while. Technicians should be challenged and their responsibilities increased and, or, rotated periodically. Among the specialty roles that they can adopt are developing expertise in new and emerging services and clinical areas, or moving into areas involving practice and staff management. Advanced training and certification are available in areas such as emergency and critical care to provide technicians with a forum to refine their skills. Practitioners rely on their technical staff to make the practice of veterinary medicine easier to deliver and more effective. Given the nature of today's labor market for technicians, they are an asset worth protecting through creative and tailored recruitment and retention strategies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,875
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,512

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,456
Tête enseignante GPT0,458
Écart entre enseignants0,003 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesTravaux en français237 207