Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Here's the scene. A 52-year-old man is brought into the emergency department, comatose after collapsing in a restaurant. Residents and the ER chief crowd around the inert body as a nurse urgently calls out vital signs, then shines a penlight into the man's dilated left pupil. Pandemonium reigns, but despite the din everyone hears the patient's rating on the coma scale: 3. “A corpse would score 3,” quips a resident. The diagnosis? Left-side intracranial bleed from an aneurysm or an arterial venous malformation. The prognosis? Not good. Hopeless is more like it, explains the protagonist in Dr. Peter Duffy's recent medical thriller, The Procedure. Had the patient come to Emergency when his blinding headache first hit, the outcome might have been different. But after reading a few more pages of ER repartee, the reader learns why the patient waited too long. And it turns out he's not the only casualty in the book, a mystery in which there is more than 1 gruesome murder and more than 1 suspect. And some of the villains are doctors, particularly the ones who ration essential care based on the bottom line. That's the subtext of a plot about subterfuge and hidden rivalries in a major North American hospital, says author and physician Peter Duffy, known as Peter Clement in the publishing world. “This is a book about people who withhold care with impunity. Whether it's Parizeau, Harris or Klein cutting health care or Wall Street maximizing profits, the squeeze on hospitals and emergency departments is the same.” Duffy knows these conflicts and pressures well because he practised emergency medicine for 20 years, including 8 as chief of the emergency department at a Montreal hospital. Now a full-time novelist, he puts his medical experience to good use. The protagonist in his first 3 books, Dr. Earl Garnet, is a fortyish ER physician in a major urban centre with 20 years of practice behind him, a young family and a sympathetic gynecologist for a wife. Although this matches Duffy's profile fairly closely, the author has purposely set up barriers between his professional identity and the persona he invented. “I wanted a clear distinction between my activity as a thriller writer and my life as a physician,” he says, explaining why he chose Clement, his middle name, as a nom-de-plume when he began to publish. “Sometimes I unconsciously used physical set-ups that were familiar to me. But I did not want the emphasis to be on my situation, but on the story.” His own story is interesting nonetheless. Like horror author Stephen King, Duffy has always loved thrillers, beginning with John Buchan's The Thirty-Nine Steps, which he read at age 10. The idea of writing medical mysteries came to him in the early ‘90s, when he was at the peak of his professional career. “I wasn’t going to see or do anything new at that point,” he says. At first he wrote in his spare time, and then he began splitting his week between medicine and writing. Eventually he took a 2-year sabbatical from medicine. By that time Duffy had been at work on his first novel, Lethal Practice, for a couple of years. “I was writing every spare moment, evenings, weekends and holidays, and living like a resident,” he says. When he finished the manuscript he contacted Bantam Books, which publishes the work of Jonathan Kellerman, a psychologist-turned-mystery-writer. After 3 months with no response, Duffy called. He “got lucky” and ended up with the same editor as Michael Crichton, probably the most famous physician-turned-novelist. Duffy has now published 4 books in 4 years. “After the third book they wanted a 2-book deal — a book a year with an offer too good to refuse — so I really had to let go of the practice.” The first 3 paperbacks sold about 150 000 copies each. His latest, The Mutant, is a sinister tale about genetically modified foods, an idea he developed after attending a UN conference in 1999. “I like a book to be smart, I like it well written and I like it to be very immediate,” he says. He also wants the reader to learn about someone else's world, whether it's that of a stressed-out ER physician, an aggressive psychotic patient or a burned-out homicide detective. “The characters have to be flesh and blood. I like to look at extreme situations, and how ordinary people deal with them. There are a 100 000 stories in a hospital, and if you take the time to hear them, there's no shortage of material.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».