Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTIONA former college football player, Jim Edwards is a large man who is sitting at an even larger mahogany desk. His office surrounded by dark wood walls adorned with pictures of bridges and platform oil rigs. Jim Edwards is the CEO of TECS, a large construction and engineering firm. The pictures are of former construction projects his company has designed and built. Mr. Edwards takes a sip of coffee while looking at his computer monitor. His eyes glance up at the door as his director of internal audit, Kat White enters his office.Mr. Edwards looks up and says, Hey Kat. You wanted to see me?Yes sir, Kat responds, have identified a problem that needs your attention. Before Kat can finish her thought, Mr. Edwards interrupts, problem?Kat continues, Yes, sir. We have discovered a fraud in the time keeping department.Mr. Edwards interrupts Kat again, this time elevating his voice fraud?Yes sir Kat continues, believe that Jay Gonzales and Fay Fleming have been manipulating time keeping records. They have been overpaying themselves and the other central time keepers.How much did they get? Mr. Edwards asks.We're not really sure yet. responds Kat.I guess the amount doesn't matter., Mr. Edwards says sounding frustrated. My central time keepers are should be the companies most trustworthy employees and you are telling me they are all stealing from me?Not all of Kat responds as she hands Mr. Edwards an incident report. Joan Degut reported some suspicious activity with her time card data to Tony Lemond about a month ago. Tony, Sandy, and I have investigated the incident and interviewed the employees involved. We would like to have a meeting with you to discuss our findings and get your advice on how you want to proceed.Okay Mr. Edwards responds. Let me read your report and let's set up a meeting tonight after the other employees leave for the night.Yes sir says Kat.As Kat White walked out of his office, Mr. Edwards eyes returned to his computer monitor but his mind was elsewhere as he tried to work. Jim Edwards had hand crafted most of his management team about five years ago. The new management team has been trying to improve processes at the company. The new managers have battled change resistance from long time employees. As CEO of a large company, his job title would allow him to completely delegate responsibility for matters such as a fraud to his management team, but Mr. Edwards took great pride in his company at every level. One time two employees driving a company truck cut him off on a local roadway. Mr. Edwards pursued the truck and read both drivers the riot act for carelessly operating the company vehicle. As he spoke with the employees, they were quiet and both looked shocked but shook their head in agreement with everything Mr. Edwards said to them. He gave the two employees one of his business cards so they would know who Mr. Edwards is within the company. A few hours later, Mr. Edwards received a call from the manager of the two employees. The manager asked Mr. Edwards if his employees were in trouble. Mr. Edwards told the manager they were not in trouble and that he felt that both men got his message loud and clear and that was all that needed to be said about the matter. The manager informed Mr. Edwards, that neither man spoke English and neither of them had any idea what Mr. Edwards had said to them!Knowing his mind would focus on little else, Mr. Edwards grabbed the report Kat handed to him and began to read the details of the incident.COMPANY BACKGROUNDTechnical Engineering and Construction Services (TECS) is a multifaceted construction and engineering corporation with operations in the U.S., Latin America, Canada, and other international locations. The company is headquartered in Central Florida and has been in business approximately 35 years. TECS provides construction, fabrication, and engineering services to petroleum refineries and exploration companies. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,046 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,131 | 0,060 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».