MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1569534774 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2012.a488488

DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar 2012: “The Futures of Interdisciplinary German Studies”

2012· article· en· W1569534774 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGerman Studies Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanModernityFutures contractEnvironmental ethicsLibrary scienceHistoryArt historySociologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar 2012: “The Futures of Interdisciplinary German Studies” Leslie A. Adelson The future of the Euro zone has been much under discussion in recent months. Yet there is abundant evidence to suggest that the concept of “the future” may itself be subject to broad social and critical revision in this increasingly global world that practitioners of German Studies inhabit in various ways. Long considered a defining structural feature of European modernity, the notion of an open future that could and would be different from the past—and ideally represent an improvement as compared with past and present alike—is being newly interrogated by thinkers as diverse as Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht (Nach 1945—Latenz als Ursprung der Gegenwart, 2012), Hermann Lübbe (Schrumpft die Gegenwart? Über die veränderte Gegenwart von Zukunft und Vergangenheit, 2000), Hirokazu Miyazaki (The Method of Hope: Anthropology, Philosophy, and Fijian Knowledge, 2004), Amir Eshel (Zukünftigkeit: Die zeitgenössische Literatur und die Vergangenheit, 2012), and Arjun Appadurai (The Future as a Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition, forthcoming 2013). Cosponsored in alternating years by Cornell University’s interdisciplinary Institute for German Cultural Studies and the University of Chicago’s Center for Interdisciplinary Research on German Literature and Culture (with focal topics and seminar directors varying each year), the DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar convened for six weeks again in 2012, this time at Cornell University under the directorship of Leslie A. Adelson, Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of German Studies and current director of the Institute for German Cultural Studies. Under the generous auspices of the DAAD, which annually provides participant stipends to allow qualified postdoctoral candidates from North American institutions to take part in summer seminars designed to advance both their careers and German Studies in the United States and Canada, the substantive aim of the DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar in 2012 was to focus critical attention on “The Futures of Interdisciplinary German Studies” from a range of scholarly, historical, and even temporal perspectives. The DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar in 2013 will be conducted at the University of Chicago under the [End Page 511] directorship of Eric L. Santner, Philip and Ida Romberg Professor in Modern Germanic Studies, on “Economies of Desire: Political Economy and Libidinal Economy in German Culture and Thought.” Seminar details and application instructions will be available as of October on the DAAD Web site at http://www.daad.org. Futurism was once an artistic and political movement, with multifaceted and contested ties to the historical avant-garde in Europe. Via Turkey and Russia, futurist motifs and legacies circulate in contemporary German literature and installation art through the phenomenon of late twentieth-century migration. Yet in the wake of 1989, the end of state-sponsored communism in Europe, and twenty-first-century manifestations of globalization, many questions arise, in new configurations across the disciplines and socially, about the status and conceptualization of “the future” in German culture and European life in an interconnected and precarious world; about utopia, hope, progress, optimism, potential, predictability, probability, and risk in public life, virtual worlds, and critical thought. This historical juncture served this year’s DAAD Faculty Summer Seminar as a springboard for reflecting more broadly on the analytical yield of “futurity” as a critical point of entry for understanding both German culture over time and interdisciplinary German Studies in relation to the humanities and social sciences today. Focal readings were exemplary rather than comprehensive, and selections were based in part on participants’ research interests and disciplinary expertise. While the seminar took its cue from new approaches to German culture and its influences in the academy and the world today, scholars concentrating on any historical period or cultural medium were welcome to apply, and the interdisciplinary specializations of actual participants reflected historical expertise from the eighteenth century to the present. Current debates about the proper place of area studies and national disciplines in educational institutions provided an additional frame of reference for seminar discussion, and the future of German Studies in North America was one of many “futures” discussed. However, the seminar’s analytical focus was on highly differentiated uses to which diverse understandings of the future and futurity (as discrete, albeit related terms...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,366
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,164
Tête enseignante GPT0,434
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle