A pilot study of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging changes with dutasteride in patients with low risk prostate cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? While not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chemoprevention, dutasteride has been shown in a large randomized trial to reduce the overall risk of developing prostate cancer. In our pilot study, one third of patients demonstrated a significant reduction in the volume of their prostate cancer as measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. OBJECTIVE • To evaluate the effects of dutasteride on treatment‐naïve prostate cancer in men using serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) in this pilot study. PATIENTS AND METHODS • This investigator‐initiated prospective single‐arm study was approved by the institutional committee on human research ethics board. • The target accrual was 10 patients. Newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients with low risk disease either with symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy or deemed to require pre‐brachytherapy androgen suppression therapy were eligible. In the latter group, dutasteride was used to achieve cytoreduction. • All patients received 6 months of dutasteride 3.5 mg daily and underwent baseline blood work, health‐related quality of life indices and MRI/MRSI, which were repeated at 1, 3 and 6 months. • MRSI spectra were examined and scored as healthy or cancerous. The change in cancerous volumes over time was evaluated. RESULTS • Of the 10 patients enrolled, nine patients completed the entire study. One patient withdrew after 3 months because of drug‐related toxicity. • Because a significant decrease in citrate and polyamines on MRSI spectra was noted at 1 month compared with baseline, healthy tissue appeared to be more like cancer and thus created a false impression that the cancer had grown after 1 month. To reduce this bias, comparisons were made between the 1‐month and 6‐month scans. • The median MR cancer volumes at 6 months and 3 months were 100% and 101% of the 1‐month value, respectively. Three of the nine patients had a 30–45% decrease in cancer volume at 6 months relative to 1‐month measures. Of the others, two had no change in cancer volume and four had an increase (range 65–167% of the 1‐month value). • The median cancer volume (range) at baseline was only 0.5 (0.1–5.6) mL. CONCLUSIONS • The inclusion of only men with low volume disease may have limited our ability to accurately assess response rates after dutasteride due to the background effects on normal prostate metabolism. Despite this, one‐third of patients had a 30–45% reduction in cancer volume at 6 months. • Future studies including men with larger volume disease may enable estimates of response rates to be made more accurately.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».