MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1569926138

Conspiracy of Silence: Sportswriters and the Long Campaign to Desegregate Baseball

2012· article· en· W1569926138 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
John P. Hill

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWhite (mutation)LeagueColor lineBattlePolitical scienceRacismSilencePoliticsNarrativeLawHistoryGender studiesSociologyMedia studiesArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chris Lamb. Conspiracy of Silence: Sportswriters and the Long Campaign to Desegregate Baseball. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2012. 397 pp. Cloth, $39.95. In this well-researched book, Chris Lamb insists that Major League Baseball not have maintained the color line as long as it did without the aid and comfort of the country's white mainstream (14). In fact, only a handful of white sportswriters ever wrote about baseball's longstanding prohibition against integrated play, and fewer still actively campaigned against it. As a result, black sportswriters had to wage the battle against Jim Crow practically alone. In Lamb's estimation, understanding the role of black sportswriters--and their handful of white allies--in the collapse of the color barrier enriches our appreciation of the long campaign to desegregate the sport. Lamb cautions, however, that the importance of their efforts is not limited to history alone; they are of the larger narrative of the campaign for racial equality in the years preceding and immediately following World War (17). Lamb begins by recounting a 1933 speech by former sportswriter Heywood Broun of the New York World-Telegram at the annual New York Baseball Writers' Association dinner, an all-white affair. In his address, Broun became the first person ever to speak out against segregated at the gathering. The journalists in attendance apparently listened politely, but later nearly all of them failed to mention Broun's remarks in their columns, revealing, at the very least, their tacit support of baseball's racial status quo. The lone exception, Jimmy Powers, wrote an article in support of Broun's statements in the New York Daily News. Powers's piece included the results of a survey he had taken among several executives and ballplayers asking whether they objected to the presence of blacks in the major leagues. Powers found that most of them did not, prompting him to call on to follow the lead of other sports and initiate integrated play. Over the next decade, Powers continued to criticize the color line, and a handful of other white journalists--including Shirley Povich and Westbrook Pegler--joined him from time to time, but, overall, the conspiracy of silence among white mainstream sports reporters held strong. Black journalists themselves said little about baseball's color barrier until the 1930s. Prior to that time, they committed their energies toward building up black rather than desegregating white baseball (74). According to Lamb, taking a stance against the sport's color line rarely crossed the mind of black sportswriters of this era because racial separation was so deeply entrenched that it seemed to be an unalterable fact of life. Moreover, many African American sportswriters were part of the black establishment during this period and therefore felt duty bound to help black grow. Finally, black executives, like their white counterparts, expected black sportswriters to preserve black baseball. By the early 1930s, however, the cozy relationship between black sportswriters and executive had ended (75) and black journalists had begun to question the color line. New York Yankees outfielder Jake Powell's use of a racial slur during a 1938 radio interview and the outbreak of World War II in Europe, which led many to question how the US government could denounce Hitler's bigoted Nazi regime while tolerating racial injustice at home, motivated black sportswriters to launch an all-out assault against baseball's color barrier. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,059

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,007
Communication savante0,0080,006
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207