MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1571359854 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2013.0032

Victorian Poets and the Changing Bible by Charles LaPorte (review)

2013· article· en· W1571359854 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wendy Williams

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryLiteratureVictorian literatureMythologyCriticismRomanceSecularizationCultHistoryLiterary criticismPhilosophyReligious studiesArtTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Victorian Poets and the Changing Bible by Charles LaPorte Wendy Williams (bio) Victorian Poets and the Changing Bible by Charles LaPorte; pp. 284. Charlottesville: U of Virginia P, 2011. $50.27 cloth. In Victorian Poets and the Changing Bible, Charles LaPorte challenges literary histories that emphasize the secularization of nineteenth-century England, arguing that religion played a vital role in society. He traces the impact of higher criticism—the practice of studying the Christian scriptures as mythical and poetical rather than as factual—on Victorian literary and religious culture by examining the works of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Arthur Hugh Clough, Robert Browning, George Eliot, and Alfred, Lord Tennyson, prominent mid-Victorian poets who responded to higher criticism and found ways to express religious truth through their poetry. In his introduction, LaPorte explains that as Victorians assimilated scientific discovery and re-evaluated biblical inspiration, some came to associate the Bible’s poetic nature with its religious meaning. The higher critical focus on the poetic and mythological character of the Bible allowed for the possibility of the existence of new sacred texts. Victorian poets, excited by the prospect of participating in an open canon, took on prophetic roles and even came to see their own poems as inspired texts. Chapter 1 charts the progression of Barrett Browning’s religious view of poetry and, in particular, her struggle to find a literary model that reconciled evangelical Christian beliefs with her belief in the Romantic cult of poetry. LaPorte shows how her early poems “Sounds” and “Earth and Her Praisers” reveal conflict between her religious and poetic visions and examines how this conflict comes to an initial resolution in the 1830s and 1840s with her reading of François-Auguste-René de Chateaubriand’s apology, Le Génie du Christianisme (1802). LaPorte discusses Chateaubriand’s influence on Barrett Browning in his analysis of “The Seraphim” (1838), a poem that balances traditional hermeneutics and an inspired poetic vision, and Emanuel Swedenborg’s influence in his analysis of Aurora Leigh (1856), concluding that although Barrett Browning disavowed the findings of the higher critics, she found common ground with them in her belief in poetry’s potential to reveal God’s divine presence. The second chapter addresses the religious implications of Tennyson’s Arthurian epic, The Idylls of the King (1859–85). Tennyson, LaPorte asserts, [End Page 219] endorsed a higher critical mode of thinking in his poem by encouraging a parallel view of British national history and Arthurian legend. Tennyson admitted to the mythological nature of The Idylls and asked readers to embrace mythological tradition, despite its doubtful foundation, as an important part of England’s national history. He thus implicitly encouraged an analogous, poetical view of the Bible as a historical-mythological sacred text. LaPorte adeptly argues that Tennyson’s strategy, unlike his message, stood in contrast to that of higher critics like David Strauss, who, in his Life of Jesus (1835–36), invited outrage for forcefully advancing a mythological reading of the Bible. During a time of national religious crisis, Tennyson comforted Victorian readers facing a changing understanding of the Bible by offering a palatable, literary example of historical criticism. In chapter 3, LaPorte traces Clough’s complex views on higher criticism and poetic ambition in his readings of “Epi-Strauss-ium” (1862), “Easter Day: Naples, 1849” (1865), Amours de Voyage (1858), and Dipsychus and the Spirit (1865). LaPorte discourages the trend of reading Clough autobiographically and as representative of Victorian religious conflict. Instead, he favours reading Clough’s poetry as a forum in which Clough explores his philosophical principles. LaPorte focuses most of his analysis on Dipsychus, discussing Clough’s view of the value of redemptive literature. The poem, LaPorte maintains, critiques Victorian readiness to make English literature sacred, suggesting that poetry provides no better moral influence than the ancient scriptures. LaPorte discusses the higher critical hermeneutics and religious influence of Robert Browning’s The Ring and the Book (1868–69)in chapter 4, arguing that Browning’s murder story, based on supposed history, both reflected his implicitly religious belief in the potential for sacred truth to be found in a melding of fact and fiction and served as an analogy...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,083
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesTravaux en français237 207