MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1573640299 · doi:10.1353/tsl.2007.0020

Apostrophe, or the Lyric Art of Turning Away

2007· article· en· W1573640299 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTexas Studies in Literature & Language · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMedia, Communication, and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryLiteratureRhetorical questionTrope (literature)Context (archaeology)StanzaRomanceThouArtHistoryPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Apostrophe, or the Lyric Art of Turning Away J. Mark Smith Grant MacEwan College Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Turn away no more: Why wilt thou turn away?1 I. Introduction Lyric, when it works, works on its audience in a peculiar way. Its effects are not exactly "rhetorical." And so when I claim (as I do in this essay) that where there is lyric there is apostrophe, a corollary of my claim is that apostrophe names not a codified rhetorical device or trope, but a demand that lyric poems lay upon their readers.2 The English poet Geoffrey Hill, mulling over the problem of "poetic voice" in a 1981 interview on BBC Radio, made this remark: . . . those old distinctions that you get in the Victorian and Romantic observers and auditors—the kinds of distinction that they are trying to draw all the time between a dramatic and a lyric voice—I think in our time inevitably merge. The lyric voice must exist, or must be heard, or has to be heard, or is constrained to be heard, in a dramatic context. (cited in Griffiths, 76) On this occasion, Hill had in mind the poet's public reading of his own poem, but what he says has broader application. He describes, in fact, the predicament of any reader or listener. Every spoken iteration of a lyric "must be heard" in the dramatic context he refers to. Of course, "dramatic" has some special sense here. A lyric poem is not a script for speaking. Nor is it exactly a staging of speech. Speaking a lyric is only accidentally related to acting. The essay that follows focuses on the figure of apostrophe in order to cast some light on the "dramatic context" that constrains lyric in our time.3 My analysis touches on poems from a range of periods over the last four hundred years, including sixteenth- and seventeenth-century, Victorian, [End Page 411] and mid-twentieth century works. The examples have been gathered from my own itineraries of reading, and considered through a modernist lens. My thesis has a transhistorical reach, though its assumptions are of a late modernist moment. I come to my guiding conception of lyric apostrophe primarily by way of Pound (via an Olson-related anecdote, and Canto 82). What starts as bare intimation gains inductive and genealogical powerin the turn to Whitman's "Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking." The example of apostrophe in Whitman's mockingbird passage is remarkably original, to the point of idiosyncrasy. Nevertheless, general principles of lyric can be abstracted from it (and reconfirmed even in much older poems, such as Herbert's "Denial," or those of other traditions, such as Celan's "Sprachgitter"). A crucial first step is to distinguish between lyrical and oratorical apostrophe.4 In oratorical apostrophe, the orator averts his speech from a "judge" and, in passing, addresses individuals in the audience, opponents perhaps (as Demosthenes to Aeschines, or Cicero to Catiline), or absent others, or even inanimate things ("O sacred traditions of Rome . . . ").5 Despite this temporary aversion of address, the orator's intent continues to be to interest and persuade whoever is sitting in judgment on a case or argument or plea. Quintilian (51–55) called it a "remarkably effective" lawyerly sort of trick.6 All oratorical apostrophe, then, is a kind of address. Conversely, all instances of lyric address turn out to be apostrophe. In a poem, the initial judge or audience appealed to (the explicitly or implicitly addressed "you") is never in fact present or available for persuasion, and so in the moment that lyric speech "turns away" toward another addressee (whether person or nonperson), it cannot turn back again (as in oratorical apostrophe). Any further addressee is also not in a position to hear or to reply (and not simply because it is inanimate); and so no lyric address ever reaches its "you." That is, every instance of lyric is coincident with a movement of speech...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,248
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,250

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,423
Écart entre enseignants0,373 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle