Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This is a film review of Jamie Marks is Dead (2014), directed by Carter Smith. Author Notes Jodi McDavid is an instructor in Folklore and Gender & Women’s Studies at Cape Breton University. She earned her BA at St. Thomas University (New Brunswick) and her MA and PhD from Memorial University of Newfoundland. Her PhD dissertation was on anticlericalism in folk and popular culture. Her current research interests include vernacular religion, the folklore and folklife of children and adolescents, and gender and women’s studies. This sundance film festival review is available in Journal of Religion & Film: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol18/iss1/26 Jamie Marks is Dead (2014) (Directed by Carter Smith) US Dramatic Who killed Jamie? This is the superficial question. But does the death of an adolescent do to those it leaves behind? and, How do teenagers explore death and the afterlife? are the more complex questions explored in Jamie Marks is Dead. Jamie's body is found, and no one knows how he died. What follows is a self-examination by his schoolmate Adam, as he reflects on Jamie's short life, and his own mortality. Jamie was a high school boy who clearly was bullied. It's possible his family was devoutly Christian, we learn he wore a Boy Scout uniform to school frequently, and that his mother had a year round nativity scene on display. Adam wonders what he could have done differently, and clearly feels guilty about Jamie's death, so when Jamie approaches him from beyond the grave, he feels compelled to help. It's not immediately clear what Jamie wants. He seems to thrive on the attention he receives from Adam. Undoubtedly, other reviewers 1 McDavid: Jamie Marks is Dead Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2014 will draw out some homoerotic tensions between the two characters, however, there's more to it than that; fraternal love is what Jamie craves. The construction of masculinity is clearly a focus in the film, from locker room bullying, to Adam and his brother who are taking different paths as they embrace their maleness. This film explores a touching relationship that develops between Adam and Jamie, something that they could not have in life. Jamie needs help negotiating his next steps, and through this Adam also explores his attitudes towards mortality, murder, suicide and sexuality.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».