Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since I was born and raised in a predominantly Catholic area of Boston and sent to a Catholic elementary school, it would be natural to infer that my interest in philosophy was stirred by questions about religion.Such was not the case.As evidenced by having to repeat the third grade, I was a very mediocre student with a mind to match.In fact, the only questions that seriously occupied me concerned the fate of the Boston Red Sox and, occasionally, the Boston Bruins.My less-than-stellar school performance continued in a secondary school devoted to science and engineering and came to an unwelcome end at Northeastern University's School of Engineering when, after two years of desultory study, I was authoritatively told that the world would be much safer if I did not become an engineer.Realizing that I was lost to engineering, I stopped my mindless drifting.My predicament forced me to ask serious questions about what I was going to do with my life.Little did I know at that time how such a personal question can easily morph into the sort of philosophical inquiries found in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics!Fortunately, a friend of mine, who was well informed about matters philosophical, helped guide my incoherent inquiries.Because of him, I became an omnivorous reader though, perhaps, a somewhat indiscriminate one.Unfortunately, I still had to earn a living and, thus, spent the next two years attached to an engineering firm where I worked as a road surveyor.It was then, too, that the judgment about the safety of the world was confirmed when one of the half completed bridges I had worked on, began slowly to sink into a riverbed.Before I could return to university to pursue my interest in philosophy, I was drafted into the United States Navy for two years.While I disliked my time in the navy, it proved to be beneficial since it not only fostered my maturing, but also helped me develop my interests.For one thing, I was the only sailor aboard our ship who was reading Plato, Aristotle, as well as George Santayana!Moreover, six months in the Mediterranean allowed me visits to Greece, Turkey, Italy, Spain, and France.Since our home-port was on the French Riviera, I frequently escaped the gastronomically disastrous food served on our ship and tasted the remarkable cuisine of southern France.After my discharge from the Navy, I was lucky to be admitted to Boston College-a Jesuit-run university.The Jesuits required all students, Catholic or not, to take two courses per year in philosophy as well as two in theology.The philosophy courses followed a prescribed sequence starting with logic and epistemology in the first year and ending with ethics in the final year.It was in the ethics course that I encountered my first Jesuit teacher of philosophy.We respectfully addressed him as -Father Toolin‖ but he was known to us as -No Foolin' Toolin‖.These required courses tended to be formulaic as well as too dependent on a single textbook.Surprisingly, although he was acknowledged, Aquinas's work never made an appearance.Nevertheless, these courses gave rise to argument and debate about important issues.1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,122 | 0,064 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».