Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research managers and executives generally concede that many of most original and innovative ideas in research enterprise come from young scientists--researchers within few years of end of their doctoral training. Experience in North America and Europe has also shown that geography presents no barrier to scientific achievement: brightest young scientists can originate from anywhere in Developing countries increasingly shape science and contribute to global advancement of knowledge, says Rees Kassen, Canadian who is co-chair of Global Young Academy (GYA), an organization that bills itself as the voice of young scientists around world. recent survey by GYA has provided insight into needs and contributions of these young, emerging researchers. Founded in 2010 in Berlin, Germany, academy aims to raise profile of young scientists in developed and developing countries. As key part of that ambition, academy organized global survey of young researchers around including those in often-neglected regions and countries, aiming to understand how young researchers contribute to knowledge landscape and determine what obstacles they encounter in process across By exploring global state of young scientists and identifying their opportunities, concerns, and needs, project's leaders hoped to initiate change and catalyze improvement in global research system. A Vast Pool of Global Talent GYA's ambitions for project, called GloSYS (for Global State of Young Scientists), were ambitious. Recognizing key role young researchers play in achieving scientific excellence and solving international problems and in driving the new knowledge economy, where research and innovation are drivers of economic growth, socioeconomic development and enlightenment for countries around world, original project description characterized young scientists as a vast pool of global talent that stands to change geography of knowledge in fundamental ways. The goal of study, description says, is to understand precisely how young researchers can succeed in and contribute to knowledge landscape and what obstacles they face in doing so ... By exploring global state of young scientists and identifying their opportunities and concerns, GloSYS project aims to initiate change and catalyze improvement in global system of science. In pursuit of these goals, GloSYS team collected 650 written responses to survey asking young scientists about their professional lives and conducted 45 in-depth interviews with individual young scientists, defined as researchers in their 30s who were within 10 years of receiving their doctoral degrees. Surveys and interviews were conducted with researchers from five regions: Nigeria and South Africa; Japan, Sri Lanka, and Thailand; Germany; Egypt, Pakistan, and Tunisia; and Brazil, Canada, and United States. The survey sample was almost evenly divided between men and women; majority had received their PhDs between 2007 and 2013. We adopted an inclusive approach focusing on all world regions and selecting countries with different development stages, said Catherine Beaudry, associate professor of creation, development, and commercialization of innovation at Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal and principal investigator of study. Our unique internationally comparative perspective enabled us to reflect authentic voice and experiences of young researchers, scholars, and scientists worldwide. Variety of Obstacles Survey responses and interviews revealed variety of hardships and obstacles to career advancement. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle