Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Uptalk is the semantically bleached use of a rising intonation pattern over a declarative sentence. Uptalk runs counter to the cross-linguistic generalization that rising contours indicate interrogatives, uncertainty (Ohala 1983), or continuation (Ladd 1996). Although uptalk has been discussed extensively in academia and the media (Britain 1992; Cruttenden 1994; Fletcher et al. 2002; Gorman 1993; McLemore 1991; Warren 2005), there has been no precise phonetic examination of this contour in North American English, where it is used extensively. My work investigates rising contours in Southern Ontario English, examining their phonetic nature and semantic interpretation. Some findings of particular interest are a) women uptalk significantly more than men; b) the overall use of rising terminal contours appears stable; and c) men more readily interpret the traditional falling contour as an indicator of certainty and finality and rising contours as indicators of uncertainty and continuation, while women are less inclined to perceive the contours as having their traditional meanings.\nTo study uptalk, I investigate the general use of rising terminal contours over declarative sentences to determine i) who uses rising terminals; ii) whether the use of rising contours is on the increase; iii) how rising intonation (L*H-H% and H*L-H%), opposed to the standard falling contour (H*L-L%), is interpreted. To examine the use of rising contours, I recorded 12 native speakers of Southern Ontario English drawn from two age groups (19-25 and 45-55) and balanced for gender as they performed a direction task, an activity designed to elicit a high proportion of sentences with continuation or uncertainty readings. DAMSL sentence tagging is used to categorize the semantic nature of each sentence (Allen and Core 1997) and ToBI labeling (Beckman and Ayers 1993) to notate the contours. To examine the interpretation of rising contours, I played tokens from the production study for participants selected from the same age and gender groups as the production study. They were asked to rate speakers' certainty, finality, and confidence for tokens produced with falling contours (H*L-H%) and rising contours (L*H-H% and H*L-H%).\nThe results of the production study show that women from both age groups use rising terminal contours extensively: younger women use rising contours on 67.3% of sentences and older women 63.2%. Men use rising contours much less (on 30.1% of tokens), but like the women, age does not affect contour use (32.7% for younger men and 27.3% for older men). According to this measure of apparent time, the use of rising terminal contours is not increasing.\nThe perception study revealed that men interpret intonational contours as having a more traditional function than women do. Men reported that the falling contour conveyed finality and certainty and one of the rising contours, L*H-H%, conveyed continuation. Women did not interpret these contours to have their conventional readings, suggesting that women use these contours to convey other social functions.\nIn addition to presenting the results of production and perception studies of rising terminal contours, this work addresses the larger question of how intonation can be examined in a variation framework.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».