Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In his article Alternative Modernity? Playing the Japanese Game of Culture (1994), Andrew Feenberg suggests that Yasunari Kawabata's novel The Master of Go (1954) embodies the Zen Buddhist principle that playing Go in traditional Japan constituted quest for self-realization and path to spiritual unity--in effect, Tao, or Way, the Way of Go. (1) The goal of the contest was not victory but spiritual enlightenment: as momentary refugee from culture, the self was reduced by subjection to rule and struggle to the nothingness of Zen, and the game became an agent of consciousness effacement, the Zen no-mind that is prerequisite for spiritual unity. This insight, that immersion in Go constituted Way in traditional Japanese culture, suggests that Kawabata's immersion in the aesthetics of religion and culture was an attempt to create an aesthetic Way in the spirit of cha-no-yu, or tea ceremony, which he described in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech of 12 December 1968 as sad, austere, autumnal, concealing a great richness of spirit. (2) The object of the tea ceremony is to awaken or reinforce in the participant sense of cultural identity and spiritual connection through its ritualized The object of other forms of aesthetic rituals, such as the art of fiction, for instance, might do the same. Indeed, such connection between art and religion flourished during Japan's medieval period (950-1400), when religious and aesthetic values became virtually co-terminous in what was called geido--the `Tao' (or Way) of aesthetics. (3) This essay will examine the aesthetic, cultural, religious, and historical contexts out of which Kawabata's prewar masterpiece Snow Country (1947) and his last novel, Beauty and Sadness (1961), emerged in order to show that geido was an abiding element of Kawabata's fiction. The phrase alternative modernity implies that Kawabata's modernism differs from traditional understandings of the term. By definition, however, the art of modernism is subjective, recondite, esoteric, and avant-garde. Furthermore, the symbolist aesthetic often noted in Kawabata, with its emphasis on spirituality and culture, informs the works of modernism's most celebrated writers, including T. S. Eliot, James Joyce, Joseph Conrad, and W. B. Yeats. Yeats's well-known affinity for Japan originated in his symbolist perception that Japan supported culture infused with myth, legend, and hazy kind of spirtualism arising out of unique blending of Shinto and Buddhism. Because of geido's similarity to the symbolist writing of some modernists, critics often suggest that Kawabata's art tends toward the Gwen Boardman relates that in Kawabata's rewriting of Snow Country, his characterizations went from more `realistic' and straightforward to `lyrical' and symbolic. (4) According to Paul St. John Mackintosh, Snow Country does the native spirit good by going back to the oldest Japanese literary traditions, and yet the novel is modern in its narrative discontinuity and almost symbolist imagery. (5) And Kawabata's involvement with other young artists in the Shinkankaku-Ha and its publication Bungei Jidai (1924) was, according to Boardman, a reaction against the naturalistic writing and the `proletarian' literature of their time. (6) When this same reaction in Europe takes spiritual direction, it is labeled symbolist, though the difference is that symbolism is subjective and somewhat occult, whereas geido uses aesthetics as Way within Buddhism, an established religion. Western discussions of Kawabata's art imply that his fiction be grasped either in terms of unique Japanese aesthetic categories or Western existentialism. In Elements of Existentialism in Modern Fiction, Mita Luz de Manuel suggests that Kawabata's modernism originates in the pervasive existential personality of his characters, that he may well have connected Buddhist `emptiness' or `nothingness' with the nihilism of Western philosophy. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».