EURO-SCORING FOR RISK STRATIFICATION IN CABG SURGERY - 10 YEARS EXPERIENCE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aim of the study was to evaluate patients pre operatively with Euroscoring System to judge the end point, hospital mortality in CABG done in last ten years by a single surgeon. From June 1989 to June 1999 the data of 262 cases of CABG done was collected on the data sheet each case was scored pre operatively with Euroscoring System. The different groups were made from this system, Group 1 Score 0-1, Group 2 Score 3- 4, Group 3 Score 5-6, Group 4 Score 7-8, Group 5 > 9, Another Grouping was Group 1 score 0-5, and Group 2 score 6-10 and Group 3 score 11-15. Pre op data was collected and analyzed by SPSS Version 7.5, The End point was hospital mortality. In this group of 262 patients, the age range was 25-77 with the mean 52.41 years, 248 (94.7%) were male and 14 (5.3%) were female. In this whole cohort of pas patients 227 (86.6%) were having stable angina pectoris and 35 (13.4%) were having unstable angina. Pre op angina status was Class I in 5 (1.9%), Class II 88 (33,6%), Class III 132 (50.4%) and Class IV were 37 (14.1%). There were 116 (44.3%) hypertensive, 56 (21.4%) were diabetics and 9 (3.4%) were obese. Recent myocardial Infarction was there in 9 (14%) of cases, the old non Q- wave infarction was present in 18 (6.9%) of cases and Q- wave infarction was present in 42 (16%) of cases. Pre op Ejection fraction was good in (EF>50%) in 204 (77.9%) cases, Fair EF 30-49%) in 50 (19.1%) cases, poor EF 9) the mortality was 60%. The Euroscore from 0-5 was having 6.1% mortality, the score from 6-10 was having 20% and the score from 11-15 was having 80% mortality. On Logistic regression overall predictive accuracy of Euroscoring is very good (90%), Predictive accuracy, 37% of deaths could be explained on the existing variables positive predictive value is 19.05% and negative predictive value is 99.17%. The predictive accuracy of Euroscoring changes with various risk groups. In low risk Groups (Score 0-5) and (Score 6-10) Euroscore predicts survival more accurately. In high risk Group (11-15) Euroscoring better predicts mortality rather than survival. The factors included in permutations of Euroscore explain only 37% of the observed mortality. It is noted that the observed mortality is consistently higher than that predicted by logistic regression. Euroscoring is a good tool of risk stratification to predict the out come but not ideally suited to our clinical circumstances. Though we have documented an overall predictive accuracy of 92%, it is limited in its usefulness because it does not take into consideration certain risk factors found to be important in our patient population. In addition, the relative weight assigned to various risk factors in scoring needs to be readjusted for our patient population in the light of observations made on our patient population. There is a need to develop a scoring system of our own which could be used for better prediction of outcomes in our clinical circumstances
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».