The Passion of Tiger Woods: An Anthropologist Reports on Golf, Race, and Celebrity Scandal by Orin Starn (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Passion of Tiger Woods: An Anthropologist Reports on Golf, Race, and Celebrity Scandal by Orin Starn Thabiti Lewis The Passion of Tiger Woods: An Anthropologist Reports on Golf, Race, and Celebrity Scandal. By Orin Starn. Durham: Duke University Press. 2011. Making effective use of online discourse and other electronic arenas to learn the truth about Tiger Woods and celebrity in the modern world, Orin Starn gathers anthropological data from social media to evaluate race in post-civil rights America. Starn offers an entertaining approach to the everyday and mundane societal patterns and social perceptions of celebrity. Adroitly recognizing that “community” has ceased to be a neatly circumscribed entity, Starn tracks blogs, chat rooms, message boards, and news sources like ESPN.com to accurately hear the tenor of twenty-first century voices in an age of political correctness. Of particular concern is how scandal in an unprecedented era of social media raised a new set of issues about Tiger Woods. His unlikely popularity was due to his golf prowess, his unracialized status, and the nature of celebrity in modern America. However, this is also a book about golf and its place in American society where there are over twenty million golfers. Starn also is philosophical in his discussion of how the chance involved in golf and the opportunity “for a more genuine outdoor experience” draws “the loner” who “finds a hermit’s solace in [the] pastime” (20–21). After a brief but solid overview of the history of golf and its connection to “the very ideal of American power, prosperity, and luxury,” Starn discusses the history of golf, its rise in the United States of America, and the fascination with Tiger Woods (9). He outlines Woods’s blueprint to displace racial memory and the immense pressures of being a golf prodigy. When Tiger Woods was lured out of college in 1996 with a $40 million dollar endorsement contract from Nike, he was already an icon. Indeed, as Starn explains, Woods’s entire life has been about juggling the enormous responsibility being a winner, icon, entrepreneur, and corporate athlete. Woods is the first athlete to earn [End Page 96] $1 billion, his wife is blond-haired, he has two dogs and two children, and as Starn points out, he and Elin are “the poster couple for a shiny new postracial America” (xi). At the ripe young age of twenty-one he won the coveted Augusta National Masters Championship, which was immediately followed by racial controversy about what would be on the awards dinner menu. Tiger, foretelling the compromise and effort to take race off the table that would define his career, promptly settled the matter by crafting a race-neutral menu of hamburgers and hotdogs. In his attempt to dissect notions of post-race America, Starn does a good job of detailing how Woods successfully navigates his career, at one point paralleling him to President Obama, identifying both men as global offspring of mixed marriages; both transcendent in traditionally white professions: politics and golf. In fact, Woods, he explains, diverges from the “one drop rule” of race to reposition himself as Cabalasian. And, as Starn points out, Woods pulls it off, until the night after Thanksgiving in 2009 when it all came crashing down as his Cadillac Escalade destroyed a fire hydrant and out spouted tales of women “trysting with Tiger” (xii). What is so intriguing about The Passion of Tiger Woods is that it is an adroit exploration of the pace of news in the internet age. Indeed, when Woods crashed his car, news spread faster than the water from the hydrant, and Woods became “fodder for countless jokes, blog-posts, chat-room debates . . . generat[ing] over one million hits” (xii). Finally, The Passion of Tiger Woods is a wonderful example of the types of anthropological studies that are necessary and possible. Despite the obvious pitfalls of the anonymity of his subjects, the approach lends itself to useful, fresh, honest tracking of true public perception that ensues in the social media world, which cannot be ignored. Thabiti Lewis Washington State University, Vancouver Copyright © 2013 Mid-America American Studies Association
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».