Effects of orthotic intervention during running among individuals with functional flatfoot
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Foot orthotics are commonly prescribed to runners with functional flatfoot (FFF) with the goal of restoring the medial arch of the foot. In addition, treadmills are typically used by both clinicians and researchers in order to measure the lower extremity kinematics associated with running. However the mechanism of orthotic intervention as well as the accuracy of treadmills in representing overground running remains controversial within the literature.\nThis thesis first compared the lower extremity kinematics between treadmill and overground running among individuals with a subtalar neutral foot type. The results indicated no significant differences with respect to rate of rearfoot angle, maximum internal tibial rotation angle and rate of internal tibial rotation between the two running surfaces. However, maximum rearfoot angle was significantly higher during treadmill running. In addition, this thesis compared the lower extremity kinematics during running between individuals with subtalar neutral and FFF foot types. The results indicated similar lower extremity kinematics during running between groups as no significant differences were found between maximum rearfoot angle, rate of rearfoot angle or rate of internal tibial rotation. However, the subtalar neutral group demonstrated significantly higher maximum internal tibial rotation angles when compared to the FFF group. Finally, this thesis investigated the effects of orthotic intervention on the lower extremity kinematics during running among individuals with FFF. The results suggest that orthotics significantly decrease maximum rearfoot angle and maximum internal tibial rotation angle during running among this population. However, rate of rearfoot angle and rate of internal tibial rotation were not affected.\nThese findings suggest that treadmills do accurately represent the lower extremity kinematics associated with overground running, however if clinical decisions are dependent on small changes in maximum rearfoot angle then careful interpretation should be employed when using treadmills. Individuals with FFF did not demonstrate the expected increase in lower extremity kinematics therefore further research is required to better understand the mechanism of running injury among this population. In addition, orthotic intervention may have a mechanical effect on the motion of the lower extremity however the extent and applicability of this effect should be further examined.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».