Perceptions of Usefulness: Using the Holland Code Theory, Multiple Intelligences Theory, and Role Model Identification to Determine a Career Niche in the Fashion Industry for First-Quarter Fashion Students.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This action research study investigated the perceptions that student participants had on the development of a career exploration model and a career exploration project.The Holland code theory was the primary assessment used for this research study, in addition to the Multiple Intelligences theory and the identification of a role model for the purpose of identifying a career niche in the fashion industry.Twelve student participants took part in this research study as they researched and collaborated in groups and individually to understand the various careers in the fashion industry and how some of those careers can provide a congruent working environment based on their Holland codes and their personality, skills, and interests.The student participants were first quarter-fashion students at The Art Institute of Charlotte in North Carolina and they presented their findings in class, for both the career exploration project the career exploration model which included an optional individual consultation.The presentation for the career exploration model was titled a Dream Job and student participants also had an opportunity to select their favorite book or magazine and favorite television program as a means of connecting or confirming their career niche.A semantic differential survey was used to assist in determining participants' perception of usefulness for this career exploration model.Overall student participants found the career exploration model useful, all student participants (100%) were able to select careers which reflected their Holland code, all student participants (100%) were able to make a connection with their MI strength(s), all student participants (100%) selected dream jobs which reflected their personalities, skills, and interests, 75% of the student participants were able to make a connection with their role model, finally there was a measurable awareness of various positions in the fashion industry after the career exploration project and based on the post-career test results, student participants identified an average of 14.4 more fashion careers indicating a 332% increase.iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I give thanks to God.There were a few occasions when I did not think I would complete this research project, but through Him ALL things are possible.Next, my deepest and sincerest gratitude goes to all who supported me through this long journey.To my committee members, thank you for your constant support, especially to co-advisor Dr. Sandmann for your guidance, encouragement and the endless hours that you devoted to this project, reading and re-reading my dissertation.To coadvisor Dr. Turner, thank you for simplifying all the complicated intricacies of the dissertation process, and to Dr
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».