Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Byrne, Susan. Law and History in Cervantes' DON QUIXOTE. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2012. 240 pp. ISBN 978-4426-4527-1. Susan Byrne initiates her study by marking the contrast between two approaches to jurisprudence: the acceptance of historical legal codes (mos italicus) and their rejection as obsolete (mos gallicus), associated, as their names would suggest, with Italy and France, respectively. Although there was no official mos hispanicus, scholars in Spain did enter into the polemics. It has been noted, for example, that Juan de Orozco and jurists who studied under at the University of Salamanca sought a middle ground in the debate. Byrne proposes that Don Quixote fits within the parameters of the issues being pursued in the field of law, and, correspondingly, that Spain's contribution to the ongoing intellectual arguments was not a legal treatise or a developing tradition but a profound and multi-layered work of fiction. As his corpus of writings indicates, Cervantes had a wealth of knowledge and experience, along with a background in dealing with the judicial system, and not just in theoretical terms. Although he was neither a lawyer nor a student of the law sensu stricto, Cervantes was able to incorporate commentary on pressing questions of the day into Don Quixote, a socio-cultural, political, and historical document of the first magnitude. As she evaluates the ideological bases of Don Quixote, Byrne relies heavily on her investigation into sixteenth-century philosophical discussions of jurisprudence and concepts of history. She explores impressive number of primary and secondary materials, and this is clearly a strength--and ah innovative feature--of her analysis, which owes a certain impetus to Roberto Gonzalez Echevarria's Love and the Law in Cervantes (Yale UP, 2005). For Byrne, variations on the theme of justice--as ironically embodied in a well-intentioned lawbreaker--and the distinctions and interplay among history, historiography, and fictional narrative provide decisive unifying threads of Don Quixote. This is, in essence, a means of framing critical areas of philosophy as part of the creative arts, an encapsulation of verba, res, and mores in the mind of one man [...] and its impact on the test of the world around him (20). Byrne relates Cervantes's statements on law and history and his thought patterns, as reflected in Don Quixote, to the Italian historian Paolo Giovio (c. 1486-1552) and to the Spanish jurist Gaspar de Baeza (1540-C.1570), author of legal glosses and translations of Giovio's historical and biographical works. As Byrne reads Giovio and Baeza, one can note the dialectical strain and the tensions--ethical, doctrinal, social, historical, political--that link life and art, the world and the word. The angle of vision here does not affect the content per se of Don Quixote as much as its contexts. Byrne amplifies ways of looking at Cervantes's--and certainly Don Quixote's--consciousness of history and at the text's insistence on its historical veracity. Cervantes not only brings legal elements into the narrative, from classical antiquity forward, but he makes them profoundly entertaining, that is, profound and entertaining. He tailor[s] his protagonist Alonso Quixano in strict compliance with the Siete Partidas prescription for the perfect knight and then set[s] loose like a bull in a china shop, and he has the squire Sancho Panza use outdated language from the Fuero Juzgo but also make Solomonic decisions on legal matters (51). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».