MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1582621087 · doi:10.18438/b8v01w

Students in Nova Scotia Schools Without Teacher-Librarians are not Achieving Department of Education Expectations for Information Literacy Skills

2007· article· en· W1582621087 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Gayle Bogel

Notice bibliographique

RevueEvidence Based Library and Information Practice · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNova scotiaThe InternetCurriculumMedical educationInformation literacyInformation seekingPsychologyLikert scalePedagogyMedicineLibrary scienceSociologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A review of:
 
 Gunn, Holly, and Gary Hepburn. “Seeking Information for School Purposes on the Internet.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 29.1 (Winter 2003): 67-88. 24 May 2007 
 http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol29.1/04_gunn_hepburn.html
 
 Abstract
 
 Objective – This study investigated whether the expectations for Internet searching strategies outlined in provincial curriculum goals are being met in Nova Scotia Schools. Twelfth-grade students in representative schools were surveyed as to their Internet information seeking strategies and their perceptions of the effectiveness of those strategies. The results are presented as six themes based on the survey questions.
 
 Design – Survey questionnaire consisting of yes/no, multiple-choice, Likert style, and open-ended responses. 
 
 Setting – Twelfth-grade students from four high schools in one district in Nova Scotia. Total participants: 198.
 Subjects – Questionnaires were analyzed from 243 general practitioners, practice nurses, and practice managers in four Nottingham primary care trusts as well as practices in the Rotherham Health Authority area. 
 
 Methods – Four research questions guided this study:
 
 1. What strategies and techniques do students use that are helpful for information-seeking on the Internet?
 2. What knowledge do students have of the different World Wide Web search engines?
 3. How do students perceive their ability to locate information for school purposes on the Internet?
 4. How do students learn how to seek information on the Internet for school-related assignments?
 
 The survey was developed through a literature review of previous research. Each survey item reflected a theme and one of the four research questions. The survey was field tested in a pilot study with two twelfth-grade students, and two twelfth-grade English classes. 
 
 The sample was assembled by asking principals at the four schools to identify two classes in each of their schools that represented mixed academic abilities. Three schools chose English classes, and one school chose math classes participate in the study. All students had agreed to be a part of the study and only students present in class on the day the questionnaire was given were represented. No effort was made to include students who were absent. 
 
 Results were tabulated as percentages of responses, and presented in tables related to the themes of the four research questions.
 
 Main results – Throughout the study, students reported very few strategies for effective Internet searching. They cited friends and family members rather than teachers as their main sources for support, and reported self-taught trial and error as the most common method of learning search strategies. Despite their lack of effectiveness, most students considered themselves “good” or “very good” at finding the information they need for school purposes. Most of the students used very few of the strategies associated with effective searching that have been stated in prior research studies. 
 
 Research Question One: Use of Strategies and Techniques for Information-Seeking on the Internet
 Only 15% of students used Boolean operators regularly.
 
 Over 70% of students did not know how to eliminate commercial sites, use particular features, limit searches to recently updated pages or limit searches to the title section of a Web page.
 
 Research Question Two: Knowledge of World Wide Web Search Engines. 
 
 Google was the overwhelming choice, with 66.7% percent of students reporting that they used it regularly. Other search engines were used from 0 to 22%.
 
 Research Question Three:
 Students’ Perception of Their Information-Seeking Ability on the Internet
 
 81.3 % of students reported their abilities as good or very good.
 
 Only 5% felt their abilities were poor.
 
 Research Question Four: How Students Learn What They Know About Information-Seeking on the Internet
 
 72.7% reported self-teaching strategies.
 
 39.8% relied on friends or classmates, 36.8 % relied on teachers.
 
 2.5% reported librarians as a source
 
 Of the students who reported self-teaching, 53% used trial and error, 6.6% used help screens and 4% searched for assistance. 80.8% of students who reported teachers as a source for learning information strategies were taught in computer-related classes, rather than in content area classes across the disciplines. 
 
 Although only 72% of students reported having Internet access at home, 64% stated that they used the Internet more at home than at school to find information for school-related assignments. 46.3% of students with no Internet access at home rated their perception of searching ability as poor, compared to only 8.3% of students who did have Internet access at home.
 
 
 Conclusion – The researchers state that actual practice in Nova Scotia schools does not reflect the standard instructional strategy of modeling as recognized by the Nova Scotia Department of Education. They feel that the results of this study show that very little modeling is being done by classroom teachers; that the modeling is instead being done by peers and family at home. This magnifies the disparity in effective skills for those who do not have Internet access at home. They also note that the goal of integrating search strategy instruction across the disciplines is not being reached. 
 
 The researchers suggest two ways to offer the needed instruction: compulsory classes in information seeking for all students, or the hiring of teacher-librarians to support instruction in the schools, working collaboratively in all disciplines. Research supporting the presence of teacher-librarians in teaching effective information literacy skills, including Internet searching, is noted.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante
Catégories consensuellesCommunication savante
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,698
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,699
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,331 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEvidence Based Library and Information PracticeMême sujetLibrary Science and Information LiteracyTravaux en français237 207