Thermodynamic and Kinetic Calculations for TRC (Twin Roll Casting) Mg Alloy Design
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Twin roll casting (TRC) process is most cost competitive casting process to produce wrought Mg alloys. At the moment, this process is successfully applied to the production of AZ series Mg alloys with low Al content. From microstructure viewpoint, one of the most concerns in the process is the control of inverse segregation which is inherent problem in TRC process. The inverse segregation is known to be formed when the remaining highly solute enriched liquid between solidified columnar zone is squeezed out through the weak columnar layer due to the compressed force during the solidification in TRC process. The alloys with a large amount of remaining liquid at low temperature and a long solidification range can be more prone to produce severer inverse segregation in TRC process. The other constraint of TRC alloys is the secondary phase amount during rolling process. Too much secondary phase can increase the roll force and induce defects during warm rolling. However, the precipitation of secondary phase at low temperature during the final heat treatment will be beneficial for increasing strength. In the design of new TRC Mg alloys, all these aspects should be considered.In the present study, the simple calculation scheme to predict as-cast microstructure of Mg alloy in twin roll casting was developed based on non-equilibrium Scheil cooling calculations. This calculation can give the evaluation of the tendency for the formation of inverse segregation. In addition, the equilibrium calculations were performed to evaluate the heat treatment condition for homogenization (300°C ~ 450°C) and final annealing process (150°C ~ 200°C) for secondary phase precipitation. FactSage thermodynamic software with FTlite database was used for the thermodynamic calculation. The newly developed kinetic solidification model was also used to calculate the solidification behavior at the cooling rate of TRC process. All the possible conventional alloying elements for Mg alloys were classified into primary alloying elements and secondary alloying elements based on the solubility limit of alloying element in hcp Mg. Then, the combinations of primary and secondary alloying elements were tested to find the optimum TRC alloys which can have similar or less inverse segregation tendency as AZ31 alloy, have similar or low roll force, but have a large precipitation hardening during final heat treatment. Several modifications of Mg-Al based alloys and Mg-Sn based alloys were designed for the possible candidates of TRC process.For example, Fig. 1 shows the thermodynamic and Scheil cooling calculation for the Mg-3%Sn-l%Al-0.3%Mn alloy. According to the Scheil cooling calculations in Fig. 1(a), the amount of remaining liquid during the solidification (that is, the liquid amount concentrated between growing columnar dendrites from the water-cooled rolls) in this alloy is smaller than that of AZ31 alloy. Therefore the tendency of inverse segregation becomes lower. The amount of Al6Mn phase for this new alloy is almost the same as the AZ31 at the temperature between 350°C to 500°C. Thus, if the work hardening by Al and Sn in the hcp Mg is similar, the rolling behavior of new alloy would be similar to that of AZ31 alloy. After the rolling process, the alloy can be heat treated below 300°C and can produce a large amount of Mg2Sn phase. As the precipitation can occur at solid state, the fine Mg2Sn precipitates can be formed homogeneously in the matrix Mg phase which can increase the strength significantly.Open image in new windowFig. 1TRC alloy design calculations. (a) Scheil cooling calculation and (b) equilibrium calculation for Mg-3%Sn-l%Al-0.3%Mn alloy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».