MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1585253769

Anna Bunina (1774-1829) and the Origins of Women's Poetry in Russia

2000· article· en· W1585253769 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEuropean Linguistics and Anthropology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryLiteratureBiographynobodySlavic languagesHistoryArtClassics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Wendy Rosslyn. Anna Bunina (1774-1829) and the Origins of Women's Poetry in Russia. Studies in Slavic Language and Literature. Vol. 10. Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 1997. xviii, 360 pp. Bibliography. Index. Cloth. Although Wendy Rosslyn considers Anna Bunina accomplished (p. xii), she is not great poet. A conservative in literary matters, Bunina associated closely with the nationalistic, archaistic circle of Admiral A. S. Shishkov. In so doing, she allied herself with what was be the losing side in Russia's literary development in the opening decades of the nineteenth century. Within this coterie, she was overshadowed by Derzhavin, Dmitriev, M. N. Murav'ev and others. Outside it, Bunina competed with literary giants such as Karamzin, Zhukhovsky and then Pushkin. Whatever reputation she had as poet flourished briefly; on death, it almost vanished. Why write book about minor author? Rosslyn indicates that [Bunina] is dead, she wrote books, and nobody has yet written book about her (p. xi). However, this is far from Rosslyn's own view and she has no intention of producing exercise in literary archaeology (p. xi). Rather, she finds in Bunina talented woman who struggled be poet within male-dominated society in which women were discouraged from literary pursuits by education, their perceived roles, and social pressures. Rosslyn's overall purpose is to advance [Bunina's] restoration the history of Russian literature and locate in the culture of time (p. xi). study, then, has three well-developed threads-Anna Bunina's biography, literary career, and life as female poet in Russian society at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Rosslyn's monograph contains an Introduction and ten chapters, the last of which is an Epilogue. first half of the study (Chapters 1-5) follows Bunina's life and literary career 1811, including early years, the death of father in 1802, and move St. Petersburg, obtain an education. There she met Admiral A. S. Shishkov, figure who was influence much of life as writer. Chapters 3-5 cover the most productive and important part of Bunina's career. Central the theme is first published collection of poems, titled with a ritual expression of modesty (p. 101) Inexperienced Muse (1809). This collection marks in many respects the high point of work. paraphrase Rosslyn (p. 127), who presents detailed analysis of selected poems (including To the Youthful Pollux and Cyclops), Inexperienced More shows the range of Bunina's style, from rhetorical pieces poems in informal, conversational modes. Detailed analysis of The Fall of Phaethon (1811), translation of well-known mythological piece from Ovid (Metamorphoses 1.750-778, 2.1-400), forms the focus of Chapter 5. Bunina composed the poem for inaugural reading at Shishkov's Society of the Lovers of the Russian Word. Rosslyn considers the poem pivotal work which showed that Bunina had arrived at artistic maturity (p. 197). second part of Rosslyn's study (Chapters fr-10) traces the long decline of Bunina's literary talents and health, decline that began manifest itself in or around 1811. Chapter 6 is titled Racing with Bound Feet (1811-15), but Rosslyn makes no comment on the oriental associations of the title. It is clear that from this point onwards she views Bunina as someone who must struggle under the handicaps of being woman writer who is also poor and in worsening health. Bunina wrote about the war with France and about death. She tried hand at prose. She wrote little. A second volume of Inexperienced Muse appeared in 1812, but its tone, which combined the romanticism of the first [volume] with rationalism (p. 209) is distinctly didactic. Concerned about health, Bunina undertook yearlong trip health spas in England. On return Russia, the Arzamas society subjected ridicule and vicious personal attacks. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,979
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle