MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1585836885 · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02126.x

Year in review 2011: Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and airway biology

2012· review· en· W1585836885 sur OpenAlexaff
Darryl A. Knight, Ian A. Yang, Fanny W.S. Ko, T. K. Lim

Notice bibliographique

RevueRespirology · 2012
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAsthma and respiratory diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePulmonary diseaseAsthmaAirwayIntensive care medicineSmall airwaysCOPDInternal medicineAnesthesia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A recent estimate by the World Health Organization estimated that over half a billion people across the globe suffer from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease alone and the incidence is increasing. Last year, 2010, was the year of the lung, and one of its primary objectives was to increase awareness and promote increased research funding for respiratory diseases. This has had some tangible positive effects. This year the European Respiratory Society's research framework highlighted the disparity between funding for Respiratory Research in Europe versus the impact to the disease. The European Respiratory Society also provided a series of recommendations to tackle this disparity, which are germane to us all. A major challenge is and has been the lack of any cures for these diseases and as such greater emphasis needs to be directed towards developing ways to restore pulmonary structure and function. However, such high impact discoveries must first be disseminated and subjected to peer review before being translated into practice or policy. In this review, we describe some important advances in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease clinical and basic research and highlight specific contributions to these areas published in Respirology. Ian A. Yang Despite stability in prevalence rates and reduction in hospital admissions for asthma in some countries,1 asthma remains an important cause of morbidity. A study of adolescents and young adults in Australia found that asthma was a major cause of physical disability in this age group.2 In 2011, there were significant developments in monitoring and treatment of asthma, leading towards future paradigms of personalized therapy for people with asthma. Asthma control is the extent to which the various manifestations of asthma have been reduced or removed by treatment, in terms of clinical asthma control (e.g. symptoms, quality of life) and risk of future adverse events (e.g. exacerbations, decline in lung function, medication side effects).3 In a study published in Respirology, Lai and colleagues studied measures of asthma control in a cross-sectional study of 4805 subjects.4 Asthma control, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma symptom levels and the Asthma Control Test, correlated with health-care utilization for asthma exacerbations, with nocturnal awakening showing the strongest association with hospitalization. Thus, identifying suboptimal asthma control is a key principle of asthma management, in order to prevent exacerbations. Spirometry is an essential tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma; however, there is still relatively little use of spirometry in primary care. In Respirology, Oei and colleagues studied spirometry for monitoring asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Test, in 195 patients from 31 general practices over 12 months.5 Spirometry with follow-up medical review improved asthma control better than spirometry only or usual care without spirometry. Although an unblinded study, these results suggest that spirometry and assessment of symptoms should both be used in primary care to adjust asthma medications and achieve asthma control. Multiple trigger factors are implicated in asthma exacerbations. As well as allergens and viral infections, air pollution is a significant environmental trigger for people with asthma, as shown in two reviews in Respirology. Chung et al. provide evidence for outdoor air pollution as a critical susceptibility and exacerbation factor for chronic respiratory disease in Asia.6 Bushfire smoke is a frequent contributor to particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter <10 µm (PM10). A substantial number of studies have demonstrated an increase in asthma or respiratory-related hospital presentations and admissions, although the effects are not consistent in all studies.7 Exposure to bushfire smoke has clinical implications for people with asthma, who should have an action plan for what to do in the event of serious exposure. Lawson and colleagues, in another study in Respirology, showed that peak flow and wheeze in children worsened with increasing endotoxin exposure in the household environment, and that environmental tobacco smoke exposure further increased this effect, particularly in girls.8 Understanding the plethora of asthma trigger factors will help individualize trigger avoidance in people with asthma. Treatment based on biological and clinical stratification9 and asthma endotypes10 shows promise to develop a more personalized approach to asthma management. Assessing phenotypes of airway inflammation can usefully tailor treatment.11 A randomized controlled trial of 220 non-smoking, pregnant women with asthma found that titrating the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) based on fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a non-invasive marker of airway eosinophilic inflammation, improved quality of life and reduced asthma exacerbations during pregnancy.12 FeNO may also help to better define small airways obstruction.13 Nevertheless, FeNO alone may be less useful in other groups such as smokers with asthma, who have less eosinophilia and more neutrophilia in their airways. In Respirology, Hillas and coworkers used both FeNO and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH as non-invasive biomarkers, and correlated these to inflammatory profiles of induced sputum.14 In smokers with asthma, FeNO increased with sputum eosinophils but did not accurately predict sputum neutrophils, whereas EBC pH reduced with increasing sputum neutrophils. Using both methods was more useful than either alone, to define airway inflammation in smokers with asthma. Other novel measurements may be useful as biomarkers for asthma control. In Respirology, Jayaram and colleagues measured concentrations of zinc (total and labile) in induced sputum from 163 subjects (114 with asthma).15 People with asthma had lower median airway concentrations of zinc, which correlated with worse asthma symptoms and lower lung function. Zinc has anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties, making it a potentially interesting biomarker, pending further validation. A wide range of asthma comorbidities and differential diagnoses should be assessed in people with difficult-to-control asthma.11 In a Clinical Note in Respirology, Lau and co-authors reported a Churg-Strauss-like syndrome in a female with asthma, severe eosinophilia, positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody serology but no vasculitis on lung biopsy.16 High dose steroids were required; however, omalizumab was not beneficial as a steroid-sparing agent, and mycophenolate was needed as immunosuppression to achieve symptom control in this severe eosinophilic syndrome. A timely invited review in Respirology by Rahman and colleagues provides practical advice about setting up a respiratory clinical trials unit, to initiate and undertake studies of treatment.17 On the other hand, pragmatic real-world trials raise different issues in interpretation of results, compared with randomized controlled trials, as shown in trials of leukotriene receptor antagonists.18 Bronchodilator reversibility remains in important phenotype to diagnose asthma, which then facilitates initiation of therapy. In Respirology, Mahut and colleagues demonstrated that specific airway resistance, used to diagnose bronchodilator responsiveness in children, does not completely correlate with forced expiratory volume in 1 s measurements; hence, both measurements may be useful.19 Hall and coworkers showed that respiratory function laboratories vary significantly in their use of spacer devices to deliver bronchodilators for testing.20 Bronchodilators and inhaled steroids are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for all severities of asthma. However, several issues remain to be resolved with both classes of inhalers. Bronchoprotection, in the form of bronchodilators, in addition to anti-inflammatory treatments, is likely to be important for the long-term treatment of asthma, as bronchoconstriction itself leads to airway wall remodelling in asthma.21 However, the safety of long-acting β-agonists remains an unresolved issue, and will be tested in large prospective trials planned by the Food and Drug Administration.22 Non-adherence in ICS was identified as a major precipitant in 24% of asthma exacerbations, in a prospective cohort using electronic recording of prescription filling.23 Interestingly, a pharmacogenetic study found that response to ICS was associated with a genetic variation in the glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1 gene (GLCCI1), a marker of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis,24 although this only explained 6.6% of the variability in response. Few studies have compared two different ICS with the use of a single ICS. In a 2-month open pilot study of 36 patients published in Respirology, Kurashima et al. found that mometasone 100 µg bd added to salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 µg was superior to salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 µg bd alone, in patients with asthma that was uncontrolled on the lower salmeterol/fluticasone propionate dose.25 Combined use of ICS for small airways (e.g. mometasone) and large airways (e.g. fluticasone) could be a novel therapeutic option for severe asthma; however, further studies are required. Biological therapies for severe asthma remain an important area of discovery, and require further translation from clinical trials to clinical practice. Omalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E, reduced exacerbations and improved quality of life in adults with uncontrolled asthma on ICS/long-acting β-agonist.26 Similarly, in children and young adults, omalizumab reduced asthma symptoms and exacerbations, particularly in allergic patients sensitized to cockroach allergen and house dust mite.27 Lebrikizumab, a monoclonal antibody to interleukin-13 (IL-13), a pro-inflammatory Th2 cytokine, was tested in a 24-week randomized controlled trial of 219 adults with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS.28 Lebrikizumab improved lung function, particularly in those patients with high serum periostin, a matricellular protein secreted by bronchial epithelial cells after induction by IL-13. This prediction of treatment response to anti-IL13 biological therapy raises hope for the practical development of biomarkers for individualized treatment of severe asthma. Finally, in a comprehensive invited review for Respirology, McDonald and colleagues describe how to set up a severe asthma service.11 They outline a detailed, systematic, evidence-based approach to confirming the diagnosis of asthma, management of comorbidities and triggers, ensuring optimal adherence and self-management, and trialling add-on therapies for severe asthma. Importantly, they provide practical advice about resources required and implementation of the multidisciplinary approach to managing severe asthma. This timely advice provides practical solutions to helping people with difficult-to-treat asthma, and puts us on the path to individualizing therapy. Fanny W.S. Ko and T.K. Lim COPD is a disease with a high burden to the society. et al. in their review of the respiratory issues in the has COPD as one of the important other respiratory diseases such as lung and is the important environmental risk factor for the development of As about of the tobacco is and in tobacco control is of in this The emphasis of and are important of tobacco control and its can The high burden of COPD in can be by a study from with spirometry over subjects was found that was in this of over of the COPD patients had without symptoms, COPD was and as only and had a diagnosis and were treatment for are needed in the and to the awareness of study in the prevalence of COPD in the setting was that that for an from exposure to and high prevalence of may to a high prevalence of COPD in this people develop COPD and do not to environmental risk factors is the and factors an important in this may to the of response and in the Drug potentially be useful in the treatment of is by Global Initiative for as an event in the of the disease by a in the sputum that is is in and may a in medications in a with interesting from et al. has to phenotype by The phenotypes are as airway viral or lung general and cause be interesting to future research this useful for management of patients with EBC and the assessment of its have been for its as a non-invasive to airway A study inflammatory in EBC during the of of et al. a pilot with an to the from EBC and compared the from was found that using can be identified in both the EBC and sputum of patients with However, the results from EBC and sputum did not correlate assessment the is a for of the of and et in a prospective study, found that the patients with the frequent from sputum were and associated by and This study also provided on the susceptibility of the identified and this can potentially the of there is increased susceptibility of COPD patients to various is et al. found that smoke and in airway epithelial studies are needed to the of EBC in the of for and also to the to in the COPD from outdoor air pollution also to This has been in the review by Chung et al. who have the impact of outdoor air pollution on lung As a of are to increase in the bushfire smoke particulate matter concentrations are than and these outdoor pollution may have on COPD patients in for exacerbation have in In 2011, two studies from found that the a for which a based on respiratory and is useful for prediction of for patients for et al. in their prospective study found that could be used to patients with without on into different management groups and the but not 1 year et al. also found that the could predict and however, this study was by its and patients had was that the shows for in as it does in A recent large prospective study from with over subjects with had no and had on found that rates for were in with than without However, it that Research was a significantly better than either or the Research for and was a tool than in the of patients with studies are needed to for the factors that predict the and of patients with with severe COPD exacerbations and disease are and in such patients predict the risk of further and the other of the clinical of et al. in a large study reported a greater prevalence of and in patients with chronic may be a of COPD in the Thus, of these in disease may be an for diagnosis and with long-term disease is another and important in which has been associated with hospital and et al. using monitoring in patients with In a study they a of reduced and increased as increased and reduced that was to quality of studies are to between these and in et al. in a study of patients with in up to one of This was to of the respiratory with in patients with clinical implications are but in an review, that this may for COPD exacerbations with no The of exhaled breath in medical diagnosis is still in its However, et al. was to COPD from severe with a high of by using two different methods to from exhaled studies are to the practical of this novel approach in an versus more methods in the diagnosis of bronchodilators are the of pharmacological treatment in et al. in a of the trial from an found that despite in and the in forced expiratory volume in 1 for subjects were in lung function, exacerbation quality of life and is evidence that a of different classes of bronchodilators provide better results than in et al. in a of randomized controlled trials showed that in patients with improved lung function and symptom compared with alone, and there was a towards a in adverse events in patients with the et al. used high to the that the beneficial effects of ICS long-acting to on airway They showed that was superior to alone in forced expiratory volume in 1 The better airway function was associated with a reduction in airway wall and also less airway This is consistent with positive effects in airway et al. in the first trial of an reported superior pulmonary function compared with However, as in studies side effects and or in about of patients versus with of adverse effects will have an important impact on the of this of in patients with is some evidence that pulmonary during the of COPD exacerbations is A that pulmonary is a and to hospital admissions and and to quality of life in COPD patients who have disease However, Ko et al. in a randomized trial of an but pulmonary COPD exacerbations, was to reduction in health-care utilization 1 year despite better of the subjects As from COPD exacerbations may for also to be of In an review, that to be more we to and also patients with practical in and action during the of et al. an important the impact of in patients with They in a controlled study of that in significant and in and quality of life in patients with This is consistent with the positive impact of on and quality in patients with a wide of COPD and that the lower the the better may be the response to The of non-invasive in patients with severe COPD who are to from was demonstrated in a large study by et A over to non-invasive of patients to be from more was the that patients who non-invasive greater rates 1 year than those who did The that non-invasive may the of severe COPD exacerbations is an important in several randomized of the methods in the of in respiratory is the of clinical In this Rahman and colleagues the key to be and the in the of a respiratory clinical trials This will be to who are on trials in respiratory diseases. A. of the in Respirology this year was a review series for respiratory were to provide the and future in their of The series a on therapies for lung disease by and on the number of or cells with is increasing and studies the impact of disease on function are in the In this a of cells induced cells and cells have been for both their effects as well as their for into specific lung However, in the of this the us that large and of and specific that require therapy. and and the of association study in of novel asthma susceptibility The and to is the susceptibility on and Interestingly, the suggest that the of as a susceptibility and the of other that have shown the of association study for asthma may be to a and colleagues the of the of of allergic airway disease and airway The highlight the and of in the of airway However, several these were also the from the of allergen and challenge to less of the disease such as asthma is and as such better of this of asthma to be of the with any to the should be with care. and coworkers then to the the of asthma, Despite the of the the the of the that it more over other more in to asthma. the to undertake studies over several to airway remodelling the of both the and inflammation and the of large of or However, the also that is not a of a but has impact on and as well as the is that the a in asthma the published by et al. the and of different methods to these cells was Although has its and the their on the use of bronchial to and epithelial function. This is one of the and ways to cells from children and as such has for to the development and of asthma. that a major in of the that to a are of to disease This year in Respirology, were published this et al. a on lung from smokers to smokers with no evidence of COPD and smokers with a diagnosis of They showed by and that of over A and were significantly increased in the of smokers and more in smokers with Importantly, these were by of lung and on of lung the these in and it is not that be increased in this cohort of et al. of in smokers and patients with is a of several but particularly on The in and epithelial cells from lung As levels from patients with COPD were than levels found in both smokers and levels of were not different in the it is from the The in to be an important of of the in the lung is the This from but also has a number of and coworkers of in exposure to and this by the of on They showed that in increased exposure. In showed that increased and a for Interestingly, may this The of has been an of COPD but is likely an important In Respirology this year, two were published that with in The of is controlled by several factors and factors are of receptor on cells and have whereas by the of by and colleagues showed that levels were in serum of patients COPD exacerbations compared with patients with levels the patients from exacerbations. serum levels correlated with levels of protein and correlated with on this the that may be useful as a of COPD exacerbations. and colleagues compared the number of cells between and COPD patients who were In COPD of disease did not increase during that the and of these cells is in COPD the of cells in of and the that is an event in the of A large number of have been associated with The lack of with and has a in the number of of these and such an of the in 36 studies that the They showed a significant between this and COPD in but not A using only smokers the The of this in COPD in but not remains to be is that important in the and of the of and to the impact of these cells will likely have significant and colleagues showed that the of for the factor in was correlate with in smokers with the of cells into The the increased is Although is a likely specific for this were not In the year, several significant studies were published or to of these studies were of large studies were also published in Respirology. et al. a of the receptor in two of in subjects of the study and patients as of the Health showed no between the and in lung function. They and showed the is being significantly associated with from asthma. and colleagues the of in the receptor in using They identified two that associated with asthma. are as the gene for receptor is in an asthma Other studies have shown that is increased in asthma. However, the of needs to be is for the reported in this study receptor is a Th2 that likely a significant in the of studies have also shown genetic between and although have not been to these this Yang and colleagues a on the and in associated with an increased risk of asthma with of and A by showed that the was associated with asthma in whereas was associated with asthma in The highlighted that of will be to provide an of and for these and in the in a study of and control from the in Using they for association with and in lung function and bronchodilator response. They found the was more frequent than that this to increased susceptibility to asthma in the Interestingly, the was shown to be an risk factor for in lung function. and asthma in children and adults of all and children with more severe more asthma This year two published in Respirology the some of the and of viral in asthma. et al. primary of bronchial epithelial cells and lung with and and compared the to cells to of the They showed that of and with the added of with which a different receptor from effects. Interestingly, were still to of these and Using a of the that of receptor was the and coworkers sputum as well as and of children and adults to the for asthma and a respiratory and during follow-up was found in of patients up to after and of the were The that viral the inflammatory response in an by increased of and Interestingly, the of was different to those the

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,977
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRespirologyMême sujetAsthma and respiratory diseasesTravaux en français237 207