MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1585836885 · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02126.x

Year in review 2011: Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and airway biology

2012· review· en· W1585836885 sur OpenAlexaff
Darryl A. Knight, Ian A. Yang, Fanny W.S. Ko, T. K. Lim

Notice bibliographique

RevueRespirology · 2012
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAsthma and respiratory diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePulmonary diseaseAsthmaAirwayIntensive care medicineSmall airwaysCOPDInternal medicineAnesthesia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A recent estimate by the World Health Organization estimated that over half a billion people across the globe suffer from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease alone and the incidence is increasing. Last year, 2010, was the year of the lung, and one of its primary objectives was to increase awareness and promote increased research funding for respiratory diseases. This has had some tangible positive effects. This year the European Respiratory Society's research framework highlighted the disparity between funding for Respiratory Research in Europe versus the impact to the disease. The European Respiratory Society also provided a series of recommendations to tackle this disparity, which are germane to us all. A major challenge is and has been the lack of any cures for these diseases and as such greater emphasis needs to be directed towards developing ways to restore pulmonary structure and function. However, such high impact discoveries must first be disseminated and subjected to peer review before being translated into practice or policy. In this review, we describe some important advances in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease clinical and basic research and highlight specific contributions to these areas published in Respirology. Ian A. Yang Despite stability in prevalence rates and reduction in hospital admissions for asthma in some countries,1 asthma remains an important cause of morbidity. A study of adolescents and young adults in Australia found that asthma was a major cause of physical disability in this age group.2 In 2011, there were significant developments in monitoring and treatment of asthma, leading towards future paradigms of personalized therapy for people with asthma. Asthma control is the extent to which the various manifestations of asthma have been reduced or removed by treatment, in terms of clinical asthma control (e.g. symptoms, quality of life) and risk of future adverse events (e.g. exacerbations, decline in lung function, medication side effects).3 In a study published in Respirology, Lai and colleagues studied measures of asthma control in a cross-sectional study of 4805 subjects.4 Asthma control, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma symptom levels and the Asthma Control Test, correlated with health-care utilization for asthma exacerbations, with nocturnal awakening showing the strongest association with hospitalization. Thus, identifying suboptimal asthma control is a key principle of asthma management, in order to prevent exacerbations. Spirometry is an essential tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma; however, there is still relatively little use of spirometry in primary care. In Respirology, Oei and colleagues studied spirometry for monitoring asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Test, in 195 patients from 31 general practices over 12 months.5 Spirometry with follow-up medical review improved asthma control better than spirometry only or usual care without spirometry. Although an unblinded study, these results suggest that spirometry and assessment of symptoms should both be used in primary care to adjust asthma medications and achieve asthma control. Multiple trigger factors are implicated in asthma exacerbations. As well as allergens and viral infections, air pollution is a significant environmental trigger for people with asthma, as shown in two reviews in Respirology. Chung et al. provide evidence for outdoor air pollution as a critical susceptibility and exacerbation factor for chronic respiratory disease in Asia.6 Bushfire smoke is a frequent contributor to particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter <10 µm (PM10). A substantial number of studies have demonstrated an increase in asthma or respiratory-related hospital presentations and admissions, although the effects are not consistent in all studies.7 Exposure to bushfire smoke has clinical implications for people with asthma, who should have an action plan for what to do in the event of serious exposure. Lawson and colleagues, in another study in Respirology, showed that peak flow and wheeze in children worsened with increasing endotoxin exposure in the household environment, and that environmental tobacco smoke exposure further increased this effect, particularly in girls.8 Understanding the plethora of asthma trigger factors will help individualize trigger avoidance in people with asthma. Treatment based on biological and clinical stratification9 and asthma endotypes10 shows promise to develop a more personalized approach to asthma management. Assessing phenotypes of airway inflammation can usefully tailor treatment.11 A randomized controlled trial of 220 non-smoking, pregnant women with asthma found that titrating the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) based on fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a non-invasive marker of airway eosinophilic inflammation, improved quality of life and reduced asthma exacerbations during pregnancy.12 FeNO may also help to better define small airways obstruction.13 Nevertheless, FeNO alone may be less useful in other groups such as smokers with asthma, who have less eosinophilia and more neutrophilia in their airways. In Respirology, Hillas and coworkers used both FeNO and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH as non-invasive biomarkers, and correlated these to inflammatory profiles of induced sputum.14 In smokers with asthma, FeNO increased with sputum eosinophils but did not accurately predict sputum neutrophils, whereas EBC pH reduced with increasing sputum neutrophils. Using both methods was more useful than either alone, to define airway inflammation in smokers with asthma. Other novel measurements may be useful as biomarkers for asthma control. In Respirology, Jayaram and colleagues measured concentrations of zinc (total and labile) in induced sputum from 163 subjects (114 with asthma).15 People with asthma had lower median airway concentrations of zinc, which correlated with worse asthma symptoms and lower lung function. Zinc has anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties, making it a potentially interesting biomarker, pending further validation. A wide range of asthma comorbidities and differential diagnoses should be assessed in people with difficult-to-control asthma.11 In a Clinical Note in Respirology, Lau and co-authors reported a Churg-Strauss-like syndrome in a female with asthma, severe eosinophilia, positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody serology but no vasculitis on lung biopsy.16 High dose steroids were required; however, omalizumab was not beneficial as a steroid-sparing agent, and mycophenolate was needed as immunosuppression to achieve symptom control in this severe eosinophilic syndrome. A timely invited review in Respirology by Rahman and colleagues provides practical advice about setting up a respiratory clinical trials unit, to initiate and undertake studies of treatment.17 On the other hand, pragmatic real-world trials raise different issues in interpretation of results, compared with randomized controlled trials, as shown in trials of leukotriene receptor antagonists.18 Bronchodilator reversibility remains in important phenotype to diagnose asthma, which then facilitates initiation of therapy. In Respirology, Mahut and colleagues demonstrated that specific airway resistance, used to diagnose bronchodilator responsiveness in children, does not completely correlate with forced expiratory volume in 1 s measurements; hence, both measurements may be useful.19 Hall and coworkers showed that respiratory function laboratories vary significantly in their use of spacer devices to deliver bronchodilators for testing.20 Bronchodilators and inhaled steroids are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for all severities of asthma. However, several issues remain to be resolved with both classes of inhalers. Bronchoprotection, in the form of bronchodilators, in addition to anti-inflammatory treatments, is likely to be important for the long-term treatment of asthma, as bronchoconstriction itself leads to airway wall remodelling in asthma.21 However, the safety of long-acting β-agonists remains an unresolved issue, and will be tested in large prospective trials planned by the Food and Drug Administration.22 Non-adherence in ICS was identified as a major precipitant in 24% of asthma exacerbations, in a prospective cohort using electronic recording of prescription filling.23 Interestingly, a pharmacogenetic study found that response to ICS was associated with a genetic variation in the glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1 gene (GLCCI1), a marker of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis,24 although this only explained 6.6% of the variability in response. Few studies have compared two different ICS with the use of a single ICS. In a 2-month open pilot study of 36 patients published in Respirology, Kurashima et al. found that mometasone 100 µg bd added to salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 µg was superior to salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 µg bd alone, in patients with asthma that was uncontrolled on the lower salmeterol/fluticasone propionate dose.25 Combined use of ICS for small airways (e.g. mometasone) and large airways (e.g. fluticasone) could be a novel therapeutic option for severe asthma; however, further studies are required. Biological therapies for severe asthma remain an important area of discovery, and require further translation from clinical trials to clinical practice. Omalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E, reduced exacerbations and improved quality of life in adults with uncontrolled asthma on ICS/long-acting β-agonist.26 Similarly, in children and young adults, omalizumab reduced asthma symptoms and exacerbations, particularly in allergic patients sensitized to cockroach allergen and house dust mite.27 Lebrikizumab, a monoclonal antibody to interleukin-13 (IL-13), a pro-inflammatory Th2 cytokine, was tested in a 24-week randomized controlled trial of 219 adults with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS.28 Lebrikizumab improved lung function, particularly in those patients with high serum periostin, a matricellular protein secreted by bronchial epithelial cells after induction by IL-13. This prediction of treatment response to anti-IL13 biological therapy raises hope for the practical development of biomarkers for individualized treatment of severe asthma. Finally, in a comprehensive invited review for Respirology, McDonald and colleagues describe how to set up a severe asthma service.11 They outline a detailed, systematic, evidence-based approach to confirming the diagnosis of asthma, management of comorbidities and triggers, ensuring optimal adherence and self-management, and trialling add-on therapies for severe asthma. Importantly, they provide practical advice about resources required and implementation of the multidisciplinary approach to managing severe asthma. This timely advice provides practical solutions to helping people with difficult-to-treat asthma, and puts us on the path to individualizing therapy. Fanny W.S. Ko and T.K. Lim COPD is a disease with a high burden to the society. Jamrozik et al. in their review of the respiratory health issues in the Asia–Pacific region has pointed out COPD as one of the important burdens among other respiratory diseases such as influenza, tuberculosis, pneumonia, lung cancer and asthma.29 Smoking is the most important environmental risk factor for the development of COPD. As about one-third of the world's tobacco is produced and consumed in China, tobacco control is of particular importance in this country. The emphasis of central leadership and multi-sector cooperation are crucially important aspects of tobacco control and its success can bring health benefits.30 The high burden of COPD in Asia can be illustrated by a study from Korea with spirometry performed over 4000 subjects aged ≥40 years.31 It was found that airflow obstruction was 13.4% in this group of subjects. Though over 90% of the COPD patients had mild-to-moderate severity without apparent symptoms, COPD was under-diagnosed and undertreated as only 2.4% and 2.1% had a physician diagnosis and were given treatment for COPD, respectively. More efforts are certainly needed in the Asia–Pacific region and worldwide to improve the public awareness of COPD. Another study in Philippines noted the prevalence of COPD in the rural setting was higher that that determined previously for an urban area.32 Apart from smoking, exposure to wood fuels and high prevalence of tuberculosis may contribute to a high prevalence of COPD in this area. Why certain people develop COPD and others do not when exposed to same environmental risk factors is unknown. Both the genetics and epigenetics factors play an important role in this regard. Epigenetic modification may contribute to the regulation of mucus production, oxidative stress response and steroid sensitivity in the airway.33 Drug targeting epigenetics strategies would potentially be useful in the treatment of COPD.33 AECOPD is defined by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines as an event in the natural course of the disease characterized by a change in the patient's baseline dyspnoea, cough and/or sputum that is beyond normal day-to-day variations, is acute in onset, and may warrant a change in regular medications in a patient with underlying COPD.34 An interesting article from MacDonald et al. has hypothesized to phenotype AECOPD by aetiology.35 The proposed phenotypes are as follows: airway viral infection; bacterial infection; co-infection; depression/anxiety; embolism (pulmonary); failure (cardiac or lung integrity); general environment; and non-specific cause identified. It would be interesting to see if future research finds this classification useful for management of patients with AECOPD. EBC collection and the assessment of its contents have been investigated for its potential as a non-invasive way to monitor airway inflammation.36,37 A previous study noted inflammatory markers in EBC changes during the course of recovery of AECOPD.38 Zakharkina et al. conducted a pilot experiment with an aim to identify the infective aetiologies from EBC and compared the microbiological yield obtained from sputum. It was found that using PCR assays, bacterial nucleic acids can be identified in both the EBC and sputum of patients with AECOPD. However, the results obtained from EBC and sputum did not correlate well.39 Sputum microbiological assessment at the moment is a well-acceptable method for investigation of the infection aetiologies of AECOPD, and Hui et al., in a prospective multi-country study, found that among the 447 patients with AECOPD, the most frequent organisms isolated from sputum were Klebsiella pneumoniae and associated species, followed by Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Moraxella catarrhalis.40 This study also provided data on the antibiotic susceptibility data of the microorganisms identified and this can potentially guide the choice of antibiotics. Why there is increased susceptibility of COPD patients to various bacterial infections is uncertain. Zhang et al. found that cigarette smoke modulates prostaglandin E2 and host defence against Moraxella catarrhalis infection in human airway epithelial cells.41 Further studies are needed to explore the potential of EBC collection in the identification of infective aetiologies for AECOPD and also to assess the mechanisms underlying decrease host defence to microbiological invasion in the COPD airway. Apart from infective aetiologies, outdoor air pollution also contributes to AECOPD. This has been discussed in the review article by Chung et al. who have addressed the impact of outdoor air pollution on lung diseases.6 As a result of global climate change, bushfires are expected to increase in the future. During bushfire smoke episodes, particulate matter concentrations are usually much higher than urban background concentrations, and these outdoor pollution episodes may have harmful effect on COPD patients in causing exacerbations.7 Some hospitalizations for acute exacerbation have resulted in mortality. In 2011, two studies from New Zealand found that the CURB-65 score, a severity score for community-acquired pneumonia, which comprises a simple 6-point score based on confusion, blood urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age, is useful for prediction of mortality for patients admitted for AECOPD.42,43 Chang et al. in their prospective study found that CURB-65 could be used to stratify patients with AECOPD, without pneumonic changes on chest radiography, into different management groups and the score predicted 30 days, but not 1 year mortality.42 Edwards et al. also found that the CURB-65 score could predict in-hospital and 30-day mortality; however, this study was limited by its retrospective nature and whether patients had concomitant pneumonia was unknown.43 It appears that the CURB-65 score shows similar characteristics for predicting short-term mortality in AECOPD as it does in pneumonia. A recent large prospective study from UK with over 900 subjects with AECOPD (about two-thirds had no pneumonia and one-third had pneumonic changes on chest radiograph) requiring hospitalization found that mortality rates at 30 days for each CURB-65 score were higher in AECOPD with pneumonia than AECOPD without concomitant pneumonia.44 However, it appeared that extended Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale was a significantly better discriminator than either CURB-65 or the traditional Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale for predicting in-hospital mortality, and was a stronger prognostic tool than CURB-65 in the subgroup of patients with pneumonic AECOPD.44 More studies are certainly needed to look for the factors that would best predict the mortality and readmission of patients admitted with AECOPD. Patients with severe COPD exacerbations and advancing disease are often depressed and anxious.45 These psychiatric problems in such patients predict the risk of further hospitalizations and mortality.45,46 At the other end of the clinical spectrum of COPD, de Miguel Díez et al. in a large population-based study reported a greater prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with chronic bronchitis.47 Productive cough may be a manifestation of mild COPD in the community. Thus, detection of these psychiatric problems in mild disease may be an opportunity for early diagnosis and intervention with potential long-term benefits. Heart disease is another common and important co-morbidity in COPD, which has been associated with hospital readmissions and deaths.48 Van Gestel et al. documented autonomic dysfunction using Holter-electrocardiography monitoring in patients with COPD.49 In a cross sectional study they described a pattern of reduced parasympathetic and increased sympathetic tone manifested as increased resting heart rate and reduced heart rate variations that was linked to poorer quality of life. Further studies are indicated to between these and psychiatric problems in COPD. et al. in a study of patients with COPD, dysfunction in up to one of This was to of the respiratory with in patients with clinical implications are but in an review, that this may for COPD exacerbations with no The of exhaled breath in medical diagnosis is still in its However, et al. was to COPD from severe with a high of by using two different methods to from exhaled Further studies are to the practical of this novel approach in an versus more methods in the early diagnosis of bronchodilators are the of pharmacological treatment in COPD. et al. in a subgroup of the trial data from an found that despite variations in patient characteristics and the in forced expiratory volume in 1 for subjects were in lung function, exacerbation quality of life and is evidence that a of different classes of bronchodilators provide better results than in COPD. et al. in a of randomized controlled trials showed that in patients with COPD, improved lung function and symptom compared with alone, and there was a towards a decrease in adverse events in patients with the et al. used high to the mechanisms that the beneficial effects of ICS long-acting to on airway They showed that was superior to alone in forced expiratory volume in 1 The better airway function was associated with a reduction in airway wall and also less airway This is consistent with positive effects in airway et al. in the first trial of an reported superior pulmonary function compared with However, as in studies out side effects and or in about of patients versus with of adverse effects will have an important impact on the of this of in patients with COPD. is some evidence that early pulmonary during the recovery of COPD exacerbations is A that pulmonary is a and intervention to hospital admissions and mortality and to improve quality of life in COPD patients who have disease However, Ko et al. in a randomized trial of an early but course pulmonary COPD exacerbations, was to reduction in health-care utilization at 1 year despite better health of the subjects at As recovery from COPD exacerbations may for also to be of In an review, that to be more we to beyond and also patients with practical in and action during the recovery of et al. an important the impact of in patients with They in a controlled study of that resulted in significant and in and quality of life in patients with COPD. This is consistent with the positive impact of on and quality in patients with a wide spectrum of COPD severity and that the lower the the better may be the response to The of non-invasive in patients with severe COPD who are to from was demonstrated in a large study by et A over to non-invasive of patients to be from more was the that patients who non-invasive at greater rates at 1 year than those who did The that non-invasive may improve patient beyond the acute of severe COPD exacerbations is an important investigation in several randomized of the most methods in the of in respiratory is the of clinical In this Rahman and colleagues described the key to be and the in the of a respiratory clinical trials This will be to who are on trials in respiratory diseases. A. of the in Respirology this year was a review series for respiratory were to provide the and identify potential future in their of The series a article on therapies for lung disease by and on the number of or cells with is increasing and studies the impact of underlying disease on function are in the In this a of cells induced cells and cells have been for both their effects as well as their potential for into specific lung However, in the of this the us that large and of and specific that would require therapy. and and the role of association study in of novel asthma susceptibility The most and to is the susceptibility on and among Interestingly, the suggest that given the of as a susceptibility and the of other that have shown similar the of association study for asthma may be to a and colleagues the of the of of allergic airway disease and airway The highlight the and of in the underlying mechanisms of airway However, several these were also the mechanisms from the traditional of allergen and challenge to less common of the disease such as asthma is and as such better of this of asthma to be of the with any to the human should be with care. and coworkers then to the the of human asthma, Despite the of the the the of the that it more over other more traditional in to asthma. These the to undertake studies over several to airway remodelling the of both the and inflammation and the of large of or However, the also out that is not a of a human but has impact on and as well as the community. It is that the a role in asthma the published by et al. the and of different methods to these cells was Although each method has its and the their on the use of bronchial to and epithelial function. This method is one of the best and ways to cells from children and as such has potential for to the development and of asthma. that play a major role in of COPD, the mechanisms that contribute to a are of importance to disease This year in Respirology, were published this et al. performed a on lung from smokers to smokers with no evidence of COPD and smokers with a diagnosis of They showed by and that of over A and were significantly increased in the of smokers and more in smokers with COPD. Importantly, these were by of lung and on of lung the role these play in oxidative stress and it is not that would be increased in this cohort of et al. of in smokers and patients with COPD. is a of several but

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,041
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,137

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,002
Bibliométrie0,0060,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0080,006
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0410,020

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRespirologyMême sujetAsthma and respiratory diseasesTravaux en français237 207