MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1586311915 · doi:10.29173/cjs19176

Mascarenhas, Michael, Where the Waters Divide: Neoliberalism, White Privilege, and Environmental Racism in Canada.

2013· article· en· W1586311915 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Margot Francis

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueWater Governance and Infrastructure
Établissements canadiensBrock University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeoliberalism (international relations)RacismSociologyEnvironmental justiceIndigenous rightsPrivilege (computing)White supremacyGender studiesPoliticsWhite privilegeEnvironmental ethicsGovernmentalityLawPolitical scienceSocial science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mascarenhas, Michael, Where the Waters Divide: Neoliberalism, White Privilege, and Environmental Racism in Canada. Toronto: Lexington Books, 2012, 161 pp., $60.00 (978-0-7391-6827-1) In Where the Waters Divide, Michael Mascarenhas has provided a detailed set of case studies which explore the racial structure of water governance in Ontario. The great strength of this book is that it systematically names and explores how neoliberalism is a racial formation highlighting not simply how water policy disadvantages First Nations communities but also how concomitant water practices privilege the environmental and social conditions that white Canadians take for granted. Mascaren draws on the literatures regarding environmental justice, social reproduction, and critiques of neoliberal reform, and incorporates ethnographic interviews with twenty-seven participants, of whom work in or with six First Nations communities in southern Ontario. The author highlights the history of dispossession, water diversion, and dam projects that have characterized Canadian-First Nations relationships, while demonstrating how contemporary technologies of administration, expertise, and entrepreneurialism are reinscribing deeply hierarchical racial inequalities. Through four case studies (from the dispossession of the Akwesasne Mohawk Nation on the St. Lawrence River to the contemporary practices of technoscientific knowledge that remove issues of power and equity from broader environmental concerns) Mascarenhas shows how neoliberal water policy enacts a form of racism without racists insofar as it ensures that poor, minoritized, and especially Indigenous communities carry the burden of being unable to access clean and safe water. Mascarenhas' research was inspired, in part, by a little reported but key finding from the Walkerton reports which observed that First Nations reserves had some of the poorest quality drinking water in the province. The question driving the book is how the stunning inequality between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities in their access to clean water has been normalized, or to use a phrase from W.E.B. Dubois, has come to be viewed with a kind of peculiar indifference (Dubois 1899:157 quoted on p. 145). I highlight two examples to illustrate the major themes and contributions of the book. Statistics from the Minister of Supply and Services Canada confirm, most of the water treatment plans on First Nations reserves in Ontario are in need of repair, upgrading or replacement (p. 21). While the regulatory regime governing water quality on reserves is structured through multiple and overlapping departments, the primary branch responsible for drinking water services is Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC). Through analysis of the Walkerton reports and interviews with First Nations water technicians Mascarenhas details INAC's approach to this widely acknowledged, yet stubbornly persistent problem. His analysis suggests that INAC fails to consult with the very people responsible for water management on reserves, and often takes years to approve applications to repair failing infrastructure. As federal and provincial departments have been cut back, audit type practices have become a common strategy for monitoring water quality in municipal and reserve contexts. However, many of the experienced First Nations water operators believe that this shift from service provider to service supervisor modes of governance has less to do with the improvement of water quality and more to do government's efforts to distance itself from what they saw as highly political and racial decisions that border on dereliction of government responsibility (p. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,144
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,733

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,187
Écart entre enseignants0,182 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Canadian Journal of SociologyMême sujetWater Governance and InfrastructureTravaux en français237 207