Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The La Trobe Journal: Redmond Barry Number, no. 73 David J. Jones The La Trobe Journal: Redmond Barry Number, no. 73. Edited by John Barnes and Shane Carmody . Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: State Library of Victoria Foundation, 2004. 124 pp. Aus $65.00 per year. ISSN 1441-3760. Redmond Barry is hardly a household name in Australia today, but a century and a half ago most people in the colony of Victoria would have heard of him, and many would have admired him. Admitted to the bar in his native Ireland in 1838 but with dim prospects at home, Barry set sail for New South Wales. A scandalous shipboard and later land-based romance with a married woman saw him shunned [End Page 276] by polite society in Sydney, so he soon made his way to Melbourne. There in a series of legal appointments he put his formidable energy to work, becoming in due course solicitor-general and at the age of thirty-eight a justice of the newly created Supreme Court of Victoria. Among the thousands of cases over which he subsequently presided—often at breakneck speed—were trials of some of the conspirators in Australia's iconic rebellion of 1854 at Eureka Stockade. A quarter of a century later Barry sat in judgment over another Australian icon: the bushranger Ned Kelly. Barry pronounced the death penalty with the customary "may the Lord have mercy on your soul," to which Kelly responded that he would see Barry "where I go." Kelly was hanged on November 11, 1880, and twelve days later Barry died in his chambers, leaving in his wake the legend of the Kelly curse but also a reputation for service to the community. Libraries were prominent among the public causes that Barry espoused, and 2004 marked the sesquicentenary not only of the Eureka Stockade but also of the laying of the foundation stone of the Melbourne Public Library (now known as the State Library of Victoria). To commemorate the latter event the State Library of Victoria Foundation has dedicated a special issue of the La Trobe Journal to Redmond Barry, with a dozen essays dealing with aspects of the life of this complex and contradictory character. It has been said that Redmond Barry opened everything in Melbourne that was worth opening. He helped found the University of Melbourne (where he was chancellor from 1853 until his death), the Melbourne Philharmonic Society, the Melbourne Hospital, the Supreme Court Library, as well as the Melbourne Public Library, which in due course sprouted a museum and an art gallery. His interests were wide and his dedication to worthy causes tireless, characteristics that readily emerge from his biographies. First came Peter Ryan's slender Redmond Barry: A Colonial Life 1813–1880 (2nd ed., Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Melbourne University Press, 1980). More recently, there is Ann Galbally's lengthier Redmond Barry: An Anglo-Irish Australian (Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Melbourne University Press, 1995). Have they left much for the twelve essayists (including Galbally) in the commemorative journal? Well, yes. The essays explore his patronage of the arts, his significance as a jurist, his role as a university administrator, his attitude toward Aboriginal culture, and his championing of a library intended to rival that of the British Museum. There is a speedy verdict on Barry the jurist from John H. Phillips, a former chief justice of Victoria. In its lawless infancy the colony of Victoria "did not need a Sir Owen Dixon or a Lord Dennin"—or indeed an Oliver Wendell Holmes—but hard-working, efficient, and energetic judges able to tolerate the arduous travel involved in circuits. Barry was "an ideal judge for his times" (24). Chancellor Barry is tackled by R. J. W. Selleck, who shows that Barry was not seduced by the gold discoveries that were sending Victoria into a frenzy in the 1850s but was "determined that the colony to which he had come would pay adequate homage to things of the mind," including a University of Melbourne (53). Barry the Irishman is the subject of Shane Carmody's contribution, which depicts some vivid examples of the Irish diaspora—including Ned Kelly and former Prime Minister Paul Keating—who...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».