Primary School Children's Interaction with Library Media: Information Literacy in Practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the context of a study of professional development in relation to information literacy, children at four primary schools were observed as they worked with a variety of media in various curriculum areas. The challenges they encountered are discussed against the bund of the teachers' understanding of information skills and resource-based learning.1 Educators and librarians have acknowledged that the skills that constitute information literacy are becoming crucial to everyday life. However, it is suggested by some that students in general are not being equipped to meet those demands in the 1 990s any better than they were in the 1980s. For example, since 1981, when Marland published Information skills in the secondary curriculum, there have been many initiatives to develop and promote the teaching of information skills in schools. Much of the widely disseminated research prompted by that report and reviewed by Rogers (1994), confirms that the original working party recommendations remain relevant today. Indeed, Rogers quotes extracts from British government reports which suggest the overall picture in schools has not changed significantly at all. The fact is that library and study skills have been taught in schools for nearly a hundred years, but many students still cannot easily find and critically use information. In some schools, information literacy is enhancing teaching and learning, but the information age has yet to reach others. Information technology and pressures on library resources and services can, in this context, be seen as a catalyst for critically examining teaching techniques necessary for fostering information literacy. Poor performance in finding and using information has in the past been attributed to a lack of explicit classroom attention to the cognitive aspects of the task (e.g. Irving, 1985; Kuhlthau, 1987). Yet the thinking underlying information literacy may be hidden from teachers and few studies illuminate process issues from the viewpoint of the students themselves. Further, whereas twenty years ago we focused on getting our most able students to think critically and do "research projects" at school, we now face the challenge of helping our least able students to solve information problems efficiently. Consequently three factors are of central concern in developing information literacy. One is the nature of information literacy itself, the second is teachers' understanding of that concept and the third relates to the conceptions of inexperienced information users.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».