MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1588035960

Surgical care at the district hospital. World Health Organization

2004· article· en· W1588035960 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Antoine Loutfi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBioline International (Bioline International) · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlobal Health and Surgery
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTraumatologyHealth careMedical emergencyMedical educationNursingSurgery
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This is a paperback book updating three earlier WHO publications: General Surgery at the District Hospital, Surgery at the District Hospital, Obstetric/Gynecology, Ot1hopedics/Traumatology, and Anesthesia at the District Hospital. It is a compact, however detailed book with extensive information written by authors with experience in surgical education, training and first hand experience in the provision of clinical care in developing countries. The book is divided into 6 parts plus annex on “trauma management in district and remote locations”. Each part is subdivided into chapters with specific educational goals and objectives, highlighting important messages as key points. These key points are and will be very helpful as a quick reference for the consulting and busy practitioner at the District Hospital. Part one addresses the importance of establishing good infrastructure at the District Hospital. The information is too detailed as it covers a wide range of issues. It needs to be looked at as a reference to be consulted in specific situations, for example, how to keep good records or how to establish a trauma team. The chapter on surgical domain is well done. It gives detailed information with practical tips and illustrations on the basis of creating the proper environment for surgery. In Part two, the authors succeeded in highlighting the differences between the adult and the pediatric surgical patients. The description/illustration of basic surgical techniques is well done, easy to understand and to follow. It should be very helpful to the reader/practicing doctor as he/she learns the basics before proceeding with more complex procedures as detailed in (he subsequent parts of the book. The rest or the book is divided by organ specific/subspecialities sections. The section under the heading of “the abdomen” teach the reader how to assess and surgically treat general surgical and urological diseases. Except for abdominal wall hernias, the emphasis is placed on the management of surgical emergencies such as intestinal obstruction, appendicitis and bleeding ulcer which is very appropriate and could be life saving at the District Hospital. The reader is presented with information on how to assess a condition, make a diagnosis, establish the urgency of the situation and prepare the patient for surgery. Then the procedure is well presented with easy steps to follow. This model or care is repeated throughout the book (emergency obstetric care, resuscitation and anesthesia. traumatology and orthopedics) which is very appropriate as the goal is to teach non specialists how to deal with surgical conditions at the District Hospital. However, some of the procedures described in the book will be difficult to do at the District Hospital because of lack or training of the practitioner and the unavailability or equipment and supply such as the use of external fixation to immobilize fractures. In summary, the information provided is too detailed and comprehensive. The chapters are well written. easy to read with good illustration of the procedures. The “key points” are well done and very helpful in highlighting important messages. It is however a “big book” to consult on a regular basis. It may be more useful if it is subdivided into 3 volumes for easier use. The first can include: Part I & 2, the second: Part 3, 4, 5 and the annex and the third: part 5 which is resuscitation and anesthesia. Given the importance or appropriate training and continuing medical education of health care workers, this hook will he an excellent addition, helping them to provide good care to their patients. As noted in the il1tmduction “the WHO would be pleased to receive comments and suggestions regarding the manual and experience in its use”, therefore the best review/comments regarding the appropriateness and the usefulness of this book should come from the practitioners themselves as they use it in their daily work. The WHO should establish a mechanism to gather such feedback. Antoine Loutfi Associate Professor of Surgery and Oncology Department of Surgery McGill University Montreal, Quebec

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,714
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations14
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBioline International (Bioline International)Même sujetGlobal Health and SurgeryTravaux en français237 207