MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1588603159

Disabled Off-Reserve Aboriginal Adults: Aging and Unmet Needs for Assistive Devices

2009· article· en· W1588603159 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Cooke, Pat Newcombe-Welch

Notice bibliographique

RevueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAssistive technologyGerontologyAging in placeBusinessInternet privacyPsychologyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationComputer scienceHuman–computer interaction
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations in Canada have poorer overall health than the general Canadians, and the higher rates of chronic and infectious disease and accidents are well-known. Aboriginal disability rates are also higher, although relatively little research has been carried out in this area. Aboriginal populations are demographically younger than the Canadian population, but they are also ageing. This suggests that disability will become an even more important issue in the future.\nThis paper addresses the needs of disabled off-reserve Aboriginal Canadians. Although approximately 80% of Aboriginal Canadians live off-reserve, most studies have been focused towards on-reserve populations with a comparable proportion of funding thus directed.\nA disabled person’s well-being is directly influenced by the degree to which his/her specialized needs are met. Previous investigation of the use of services by disabled Aboriginal people suggests that there is a large degree of unmet need for services, especially at older ages. However, there has been no examination of unmet needs for aids or assistive devices, including hearing and vision aids, mobility devices, as well as modifications to dwellings such as wheelchair ramps or lifts. Like access to and use of services, access to assistive devices may be influenced by education about services and programs, the availability of programs and benefits, the cultural appropriateness of service delivery as well as income characteristics. In Aboriginal populations, access to services is further complicated by differences in the benefit programmes that serve Registered Indians and Inuit, and Métis and Non-Status First Nations.\nUsing the 2006 Participation and Activity Limitation Survey (PALS) and the 2006 Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS), this paper examines the age-related patterns of unmet needs for aids and assistive devices and modifications to dwellings among off-reserve Aboriginal people with disabilities, and compares them to the non-Aboriginal population. We find that older Aboriginal women were at somewhat higher risk to disability than older Aboriginal men or non-Aboriginal people, and also that their relative risk of having unmet needs was higher. A majority of these needs were related to mobility, with income the main reason they had not been met. Multivariate logistic regression models of the probability of unmet needs are used to isolate the contribution of education and income, as well as the differences between Status and non-Status First Nations, Inuit, and Métis.\nMartin Cooke is an assistant professor jointly appointed in the departments of Sociology and Health Studies and Gerontology at the University of Waterloo, where he teaches in the Master of Public Health programme. Born in Winnipeg, he studied sociology at the University of Winnipeg and sociology and demography the University of Western Ontario. His research areas have been in the social demography and health of Aboriginal peoples and social policy from a life course perspective. Past research topics have included First Nations mobility and migration, women’s experiences with social assistance, and indicators of well-being for Aboriginal populations. He is currently the principal investigator of a SSHRC-funded project examining the life course trajectories of First Nations and Métis people, and an editorial board member of the International Indigenous Policy Journal.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,120
Tête enseignante GPT0,442
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueScholarship@Western (Western University)Même sujetAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTravaux en français237 207