A new high-efficiency, linear power amplification design technique derived from nonlinear dynamical systems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper describes the design and simulation results of a new concept in power amplification called Syncrodyne power amplification. Here we describe the design procedure for our Series-3 power amplifier for GSM waveforms. The foundation of this design has its basis in a subset of nonlinear behavior called chaotic dynamics. Since the groundbreaking publication by Ott, Grebogi, and Yorke [1] on control of chaotic systems, a great deal of work has been done in communication using chaos [2] [3], weak signal detection [4], and synchronization [5], among many other things. We first reported on the formulation, simulation, and experimentation of the Syncrodyne amplification technique for a 2-MHz system [6], then proposed and simulated an 800-MHz design using a heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT) [7]. Since then, we’ve developed a method to apply this technique for the power amplification of GSM waveforms. Figure 1 shows a block diagram of the Syncrodyne Power Amplifier. The general concept is that a small input signal induces a chaotic oscillator of sufficiently higher power to take on its behavior via synchronization. The breakthrough realization was that a chaotic oscillator can be synchronized to a non-chaotic oscillation, and thereby take on the behavior of an arbitrary waveform. A modified Colpitt’s oscillator designed by Cicarrelli [8] was used as the central oscillator. Although this oscillator was not designed to be chaotic, it is well documented that an oscillator of Colpitts topology can produce chaotic oscillations [9]. Figure 2 shows the frequency content of the output of the free running chaotic oscillator. It shows the broad spectral content that is indicative of chaotic behavior as well as a peak at fundamental frequency of 860 MHz . We show that the gain is directly related to the coupling characteristics of the chaotic system, governed by the unstable manifolds [10], while the high efficiency is a result of operating the transistor in strongly nonlinear region of operation, thereby maximizing the voltage and current swings. Figure 3 shows the frequency content of the amplifier output. To date, our simulation gives results of 16-dB gain, 50% PAE, with harmonics at least 30- dB down from the fundamental. We continue to push the performance limits and are currently developing the prototype device for applications in cellular handsets and base stations that demonstrate 70% PAE or better. REFERENCES [1] E. Ott, C. Grebogi, J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1196 (1990). [2] S. Hayes, C. Grebogi, E. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3031 (1993). [3] H. Dedieu, M.P. Kennedy, and M. Hasler, “Chaos shift keying; Modulation and demodulation of a chaotic carrier using self-synchronizing Chua’s circuit,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 40, pp. 634-642, 1993. [4] C. M. Glenn, S. Hayes, Weak Signal Detection by Small-Perturbation Control of Chaotic Orbits, 1996 IEEE-MTT Symposium Digest (June 1996). [5] L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Synchronization in Chaotic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990). [6] C. M. Glenn, Synthesis of a Fully-Integrated Digital Signal Source for Communications from Chaotic Dynamics-based Oscillations, Doctoral Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University, January 2003. [7] C. M. Glenn, High-Gain, High-Efficiency Power Amplification for PCS, International Symposium on Advanced Radio Technology Digest, March 2003. [8] S. Cicarelli, Development of a Digital Wireless Communication System for Security Sensor Applications, Defense Nuclear Agency (Jan 1998) [9] Francis Moon, Chaotic Vibrations, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987. [10] Edward Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Canada, 1993.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».