MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1589976905 · doi:10.1111/jgs.13517

Reversible Methotrexate‐Induced Dementia: A Case Report

2015· letter· en· W1589976905 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauren Dautzenberg, Naomi Jessurum, P. L. J. Dautzenberg, Carolina J. P. W. Keijsers

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDementiaMethotrexateRheumatoid arthritisDepression (economics)Juvenile rheumatoid arthritisInternal medicinePediatricsSurgeryArthritis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Low-dose oral methotrexate is an established and highly effective treatment for severe psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis, but its mechanism of action for these indications remains unclear.1 Folate antagonism and inhibition of polyamines are known to contribute to the antiproliferative effects.2 In patients with hematological cancer, methotrexate is known for its central neurotoxic side effects after long-term intrathecal administration, ranging from acute aseptic meningitis to delayed toxicities comprising cognitive deficits and progressive dementia, but all these cases concerned long-term intrathecal administration in children.3, 4 A case with reversible dementia after withholding low-dose oral methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is reported. A 78-year-old man was treated with 15 mg of methotrexate once a week in combination of 2.5 mg of folic acid 6 days a week after a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. His medical history included periods of major depression. Eleven months after starting methotrexate, he was hospitalized on a psychiatric ward because of mood and behavioral disorders and cognitive disturbances. Methotrexate was continued. After 3 weeks of clinical observation (including comprehensive neuropsychologic testing and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain) and treatment with nortriptyline 75 mg once a day, a diagnosis of dementia syndrome, probably symptomatic frontal lobe, was made, with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) severity of 1. The cognitive domain of the CDR was 2. Four months later, he visited the memory clinic for a second opinion. Cognitive disturbances (Montreal Cognitive Assessment 20/30) and symptoms of frontal lobe dysfunction such as agitation, lack of empathy, and inappropriate and rude reactions were seen. After consulting the rheumatologist, methotrexate was withdrawn. Four weeks later, the neuropsychological tests started to improve (e.g., Mini–Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 26), and his symptoms of frontal lobe dysfunction decreased. He had no symptoms of depression. One year after withdrawal of methotrexate, his MMSE score was 30, with a clinical diagnosis of multidomain mild cognitive impairment. The behavioral disturbances no longer existed. This case-report describes a 78-year-old mean with a dementia syndrome, symptomatic frontal lobe, after the use of low-dose oral methotrexate that was reversed upon withdrawal of the methotrexate. In the literature, reversible cognitive disturbances after start and rechallenge with low-dose methotrexate were described 25 years ago in older adults with mild renal insufficiency,5 but a case of methotrexate-induced dementia is not described in the literature. In the Netherlands, seven cases (aged 52–77) with cognitive disturbances after the start (latency time 1–24 months) of low-dose oral methotrexate (5–32.5 mg once a week) were reported to the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, which is responsible for the collection and analysis of spontaneously reported adverse drug reactions in the Netherlands. The cognition of three of these individuals recovered after withdrawal of methotrexate. Like the case described herein, improvement of an adverse reaction after withdrawal of a suspected drug without additional treatment points to a causal relationship between the suspected drug and the adverse reaction. The reason methotrexate affects cognition is not clear. There may be several mechanisms. One explanation is depletion of folic acid. Methotrexate is a folic acid antagonist, and the addition of folic acid with the use of methotrexate is standard care. Older people are especially vulnerable to cognitive problems caused by folic acid deficiencies, and the administration of methotrexate may enhance this.6 Furthermore, folate deficiency induces several pathophysiological changes that are supposed to be pathogenetic in Alzheimer's disease, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of calcium regulation, neuronal and synaptic impairment, and accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau and β-amyloid.7 Another explanation for the effect of methotrexate on cognition is the effect of methotrexate on polyamines like putrescine, spermidine, and spermine seen in rodents.8 Polyamines influence the aggregation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides into fibrils, known as a risk for Alzheimer's disease.9 Polyamines have recently been recognized as important elements in the development of many brain diseases.10 Finally, the man describe herein had had several bouts of depression. Depression and frontal lobe dementia decrease the function of the prefrontal areas,11 so this man might have been prone to the potential negative effect of methotrexate on cognition. This case shows that in cases of vulnerability, older people or people known to have depressed periods, low-dose methotrexate can cause cognitive disturbances and even the clinical syndrome of dementia. If low-dose oral methotrexate is needed in these individuals, screening cognitive functions before and during methotrexate treatment may be useful. Perhaps in these individuals, the recommended dose of additional folic acid needs to be increased. Conflict of Interest: Paul J. L. Dautzenberg is on the 2012 advisory board for Eli-Lilly and the 2012 advisory board for Novartis; received sponsorship for a memory congress from 2001 to 2013 from Novartis; and participated in Phase III medication trials for MSD, Novartis, and Janssen-Cilag during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Author Contributions: All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. Data collection: Dautzenberg. Study supervision: Keijsers. All authors approved the final version. Sponsor's Role: No sponsor.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,271
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207