Managing a solitary fibrous tumour of the diaphragm from above and below
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Solitary fibrous tumours are rare spindle-cell neoplasms that usually arise from visceral and parietal pleura and peritoneum and are likely of either mesothelial cell origin or fibroblast/primitive mesenchymal cell origin.1 They are typically found in the chest and occasionally the abdominal cavity but have been reported in the parotid gland, pericardium, ovary, liver, intestine, lung, orbit, upper respiratory tract, bladder and periosteum.2 Solitary fibrous tumours involving the diaphragm arising from overlying pleura or underlying peritoneum have been occasionally described but never with such intimate involvement. A 32-year-old female smoker presented with clinical features typical for gallstones. An ultrasound of her biliary system confirmed cholelithiasis but also noted a large heterogeneous solid hypoechoic mass medial to the spleen in the left upper quadrant. Beyond issues with symptoms related to gallstones, she denied any other problems including breathlessness, atypical chest pain or referred pain. She had no night sweats or weight loss, and clinical examination was unremarkable. A chest computerized tomography (CT) demonstrated a large mass in intimate contact with the left hemidiaphragm (Fig. 1a,b). Following standard general anaesthesia and single lung ventilation, a left video-assisted thoracoscopic assessment showed the mass appearing to be within the diaphragm or pushing up from the abdomen. A laparoscopy was performed, which confirmed the mass was within the diaphragm itself (Fig. 2) and completely separate form underlying abdominal viscera. Following left thoracotomy, a full thickness excision of the hemidiaphragm with the tumour contained within its leaves was completed. The hemidiaphragm was reconstructed using Gore-Tex (Flagstaff, AZ, USA). Chest CT demonstrating the heterogeneous mass intimate to the left hemidiaphragm in transverse (a) and coronal (b) sections (white arrows). Laparoscopic view of the tumour protruding into the abdominal cavity. The patient went on to make an uneventful recovery, and following discharge at one-year follow-up, was fully recovered with a chest CT showing no evidence of recurrence. Tumour inspection found grossly normal diaphragmatic tissue covering both sides of the specimen. Immunoperoxidase stains demonstrated strong diffuse cytoplasmic positivity for CD34 as well as vimentin, Bcl-2 and S100, but a lack of strong cytokeratin positivity. The morphologic and immunophenotypic features were those of a solitary fibrous tumour. Solitary fibrous tumours can arise at any age in either sex but typically presents after the fourth decade as a slow growing painless well-circumscribed mass.1,2 Up to 20% of tumours exhibit malignant features including ‘paraneoplastic-like syndromes’ such as hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthopathy, hypoglycaemia and clubbing3 as well as local recurrence and distant metastasis. Histologically, malignancy is suggested by the presence of pleomorphic cells with atypical nuclei, high mitotic rate and necrosis. The unifying characteristic of solitary fibrous tumours is positive staining for CD-34, resulting from the spindle cells. Positive immunostaining for Bcl-2 and CD99 is also observed, but their presence is not uniform and positivity is often weak.4 Surgical resection of the tumour is the treatment of choice, with any associated paraneoplastic syndromes typically resolving following complete excision.3,4 Local recurrence is possible if incompletely excised, and malignant transformation has been reported.2 The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with post-operative radiation therapy in cases of large tumours with positive surgical margins after resection has been described.5 Long-term clinical follow-up is recommended, particularly if the histological evaluation suggests malignancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».