International Conferences on the Ancient Novel (ICAN): The Intellectual Growth of an Idea, the Explosion of a Movement
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On 12-17 July 1976, at University College of North Wales, Bangor, B.P. Reardon organized ICAN I. After conference he edited a volume entitled Erotica Antiqua (1977), which was a record of opening session plus dinner and speaker; names of speakers and titles of their papers (49 in number; by country: UK 17, USA 8, Canada 7, Germany 4, France 3, The Netherlands 3, Spain 3, Italy 1, Mexico 1, New Zealand 1, Romania 1); names and addresses (without email) of 75 participants; longish abstracts of each paper; detailed menu with wine list, presider, and speaker at conference dinner. The concluding reception was held at house of Bryan and Janette Reardon. He notes that the idea took shape in my mind for holding a meeting of scholars interested in ancient novel and an occasion offered itself in coming centenary, in 1976, of Rohde's major study Der griechische Roman ... The Times (price 12 pence), 17 July 1976, reported conference. The sainted J.P. Sullivan and I made journey to Bangor from London by train in a second-class car but with a first-class hamper from Fortnum and Mason. Of 75 participants at least 19 have died, and 15 are still active in novel studies. The organizer of ICAN I died 6 November 2009; at ICAN III (2000) in Groningen his students and colleagues (those who took part in ICAN I) had held a surprise dinner for him and Janette. Photographic records (35 mm film) of ICAN I were destroyed in development process, but group photographs of ICAN II (1989), III (2000, in color) and ICAN IV on-line, are precious mementos. That Reardon chose to hold conference in July is owing to one or two considerations or to a combination of them: he wanted to wait for warmth--or at least until ice melted; he wished to commemorate oft-repeated statement made by Ben Edwin Perry, The Ancient Romances (Berkeley 1967, 175) that ancient novel was conceived on a Tuesday afternoon in July. ICAN I accomplished many things: gathering of so many good scholars gave respectability to study of ancient novel and reassured younger scholars that here was a valid field awaiting development; large number of seminal ideas given voice resonated in minds of participants and enriched their research and teaching; most popular genre in contemporary literature is novel, and it was shown to have originated like epic, lyric, and drama in ancient world, and though purveyors of modern literature are reluctant to admit it, novel first arose in classical world and not in 17th or 18th century Britain, France, or Spain; ideas discussed at ICAN I demonstrated to all in attendance that what they were doing was worth a grown man's time. Perhaps we might date beginning of explosion of interest in ancient novel to publication of influential The Ancient Romance (1967) by Ben Edwin Perry, but it seems more likely because of timing and size of blossoming that we should date it around period after 1976 and ICAN I. Because of effects of ICAN I, founders of Petronian Society Newsletter (PSN) enlarged its scope beyond Petronius in 1979 (vol. 10.2) to encompass all Greek and Latin novels, all so-called fringe novels (e.g., The Life of Aesop), and all fragments of ancient novels. The quality of research and quantity of publications ancient novel has grown dramatically. The Bangor conference had its light moments. In an after-dinner paper Stephanie West (with a straight face) reported discovery of new fragments of a novel papyri, which, however, she had made out of whole cloth. Some in audience accepted her imaginings as fact. It was not until 1989, 13 years after ICAN I, that ICAN II was held at Dartmouth College, under guidance of James Tatum. Dartmouth is located in far northeast of USA, in Hanover, New Hampshire just across Connecticut River from Vermont. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».