Randall Martin and Katherine Scheil, eds. <i>Shakespeare/Adaptation/Modern Drama: Essays in Honour of Jill L. Levenson</i>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
RANDALL MARTIN and KATHERINE SCHEIL, eds. Shakespeare/Adaptation/Modern Drama: Essays in Honour of Jill L. Levenson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011. xiii + 329 pp., 4 illustrations. In Shakespeare/Adaptation/Modern Drama: Essays in Honour of Jill L. Levenson, the editors bring together fifteen scholars whose work is possible because of Levenson's ground-breaking studies in the three title topics. Defending the seemingly arbitrary combination of topics in their introduction, the editors, Randall Martin and Katherine Scheil, argue: These asymmetrical but overlapping spheres have created a mega-field of intertextual relations, (3) and that these fifteen essays contribute to the historical and contemporary discursive relationships that partially constitute both and modern drama as adaptive fields (4). Throughout the introduction the editors play on a double meaning of the word 'adaptation.' Within the context of discussing dramatic and performative work, 'adaptation' means a new work derived from a sustained engagement with a literary text, as Julie Sanders defines it, whereas the term takes on Darwinian undertones when the editors shift to the use of 'self-adaptation.' Although this term is never explicitly defined in the introduction, I take it to be closely related to the New Historicist 'self-fashioning.' The essays have logically been compiled and organized into three sections: and Modern Drama, Shakespeare, and finally, Modern Drama. Part I focuses on in modern adaptation and performance, on stage, screen, and in narrative. This section broadly explores topics that include Hersh Zeifman's discussion of Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead as being heavily influenced by not only Waiting for Godot, but also Beckett's short stories and the Belgian philosopher Arnold Geulincx. Andrea Most examines Side Storythrough the lens of early- and mid-twentieth-century Jewish influences on the entertainment industry in West Side Storyand the Vestiges of Theatrical Liberalism. Peter Holland performs a reverse-chronological analysis of three adaptations for the stage in Unwinding Coriolanus: Osborne, Grass, and Brecht. Robert Ormsby and John H. Astington argue for performances of as reflections of nationalism in 'Bold, but Seemingly Marketable': The 2007 Stratford Ontario Merchant and Macbeth and Modern Politics, respectively. This section, not only the longest in the book, but also the most diverse in its subject matter, also manages to discuss representations of live performance on film in Margaret Jane Kidnie's Staging for 'Live' Performance in The Eyre Affair and Stage Beauty, as well as the various identities crafted for the Bard with the emergence of the memoir in Katherine Scheil's contribution. Part II moves toward discussing Shakespeare's stylistic evolution not only over time, but also within a single work. James C. Bulman's contribution on Editing the Bawdy in Henry IV, Part Two, explores the increased use of bawdy wordplay from Part One to Part Two of Henry IV, whereas Stanley Wells's Extremes of Passion examines the way that cues actors' emotional shifts within the text of King Lear. This section also seeks to challenge long-held assumptions of Shakespearean scholarship, as in Alexander Leggatt's Shakespeare and the Indifference of Nature, and Hanna Scolnicov's Lear's Conversation with the Philosopher, wherein they each seek to problematize canonical readings of these studied texts. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».