MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1590565437 · doi:10.1080/13608740802005868

Roman Catholicism, Secularization and the Recovery of Traditional Communal Values: The 1998 and 2007 Referenda on Abortion in Portugal

2008· article· en· W1590565437 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Christopher Manuel, Maurya N. Tollefsen

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouth European Society & Politics · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion and Society Interactions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSecularizationAbortionPortugueseRhetoricSolidarityCompassionPolitical scienceLegalizationErasmus+SociologyPolitical economyLawPoliticsHistoryTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract In the 34 years since the 25 April 1974 Carnation Revolution, there have been sporadic efforts by progressive forces to legalize abortion in Portugal. This activity has intensified over the past nine years, culminating with two national referenda on the subject. This article investigates the Roman Catholic Church's contemporary role in Portuguese society. That is, would the Church maintain its traditional influential role over public policy formation in a secularizing Portugal, especially related to its moral teaching? Additionally, the authors identify another dimension of the national debate over abortion: the pro-choice side's successful harmonization of its rhetoric to certain traditional communal values found in Portuguese society — namely compassion, solidarity and support — and, in so doing, forged a recovery of those values. Keywords: AbortionPortugalReferendumCatholicismEurope Notes [1] The law, which was enacted in 1928, has a heavy penalty for offenders. In 2007, a celebrated Portuguese bullfighter was fined $137,000 for killing a bull at the end of a fight (Bilefsky 2007 Bilefsky, D. 2007. Matador wins. Bull dies. The end? Not in Portugal. The New York Times, 12 August, available online at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/world/europe/12portugal.html [Google Scholar]). [2] There were two trials in 1979. The first trial was of a journalist who produced a TV programme on abortion. He was tried for moral outrage. The second trial involved a student nurse who had an abortion (Vilar 2002 Vilar, D. 2002. Abortion: The Portuguese case. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19): 156–161. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). [3] The three most important documents relating to religious freedom in contemporary Portugal are the Portuguese Constitution of 1976, the 2001 Religious Freedom Act and the 1940 Concordat. The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, the Religious Freedom Act grants non-Catholic religions the same benefits previously only ascribed to the Roman Catholic Church, and the 1940 Concordat between the Portuguese government and the Vatican is currently being revised in light of Vatican II understandings of church-state relations. All of this is quite distinct from the virulently anti-clerical and secular Lei de Separação (Church/State separation law) in 1911 which actually placed the Church under the control of the state. Civil authorities are dialoguing with the Church authorities to allow for both secular and clerical space in Portuguese society. In short, these new procedures and understanding adopted since the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s and the Portuguese democratic transition in the 1970s invite the Catholic Church to participate in public policy process, but not to control it (Manuel & Mott 2006 Manuel, P. C. and Mott, M. 2006. "Latin European church: une messe est possible". In The Catholic Church and the Nation-state, Edited by: Manuel, P. C., Reardon, L. and Wilcox, C. 53–69. Washington: Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar]). [4] Accordingly, many Catholic figures used their voices through media outlets to appeal to the large Portuguese Catholic community arguing that 'the right to life is inviolable and cannot be discussed.' The same was true during the 2007 debate, see 'Missa não é local de campanha. Há outros momentos', Rádio e Televisão de Portugal, available online at: http://www.rtp.pt/index.php?article = 266519&visual = 16 [5] See 'Cardeal D. José Policarpo diz que aborto é uma atitude egoísta', PortugalDiário, available online at: http://www.portugaldiario.iol.pt/noticia.php?id = 764989 [6] In Vilar's words, 'It [abortion] has always been a part of life here. Everyone knows where to have an abortion in Portugal, including judges, the police and all the authorities. It has been very consistent, both before and after the revolution in 1974: the state always wanted to say publicly that they were against abortion and that they had banned it, but there has always been a culture of tolerance towards abortions' (Vilar quoted in Irish Times, 1998). [7] Many protested about the trials by signing petitions to end the law while others protested outside the site of the trial. Francisco Louca, the leader of the Left Block [BE] well articulated the pro-choice position at that moment in Portugal with this observation, 'The court was a prisoner of the law and this is why the crime was the trial itself. Having to try people who chose to terminate their pregnancies, to have an abortion, is a situation that cannot be allowed to continue in Portugal' (BBC 2002 BBC. 2002. Portugal: Pro-abortion campaigners call for change in law after trial. BBC Monitoring Europe, 18 January [Google Scholar]). [8] Sócrates faced opposition from Patrido Popular leader, José Ribeiro e Castro, who claimed that 'Sócrates will be responsible for this sad chapter in Portugal's history, for insisting on a political move that has split Portuguese society' (Sócrates quoted in The Toronto Star 2007). [9] By 2007, many European countries had adopted more liberal abortion laws leaving only four European countries without abortion on demand. Sócrates focused on the Portuguese people's desire to thrive among its other European neighbours. [10] Apelo religioso não tem qualquer efeito no voto católico: Igreja Praticantes separam religião da política', PortugalDiário, available online at: http://www.portugaldiario.iol.pt/noticia.php?id = 502368&div_id = 291

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,574
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,748

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations14
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSouth European Society & PoliticsMême sujetReligion and Society InteractionsTravaux en français237 207