MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1591237046

Be(a)very Afraid

2010· article· en· W1591237046 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lance Strate

Notice bibliographique

RevueETC.: A Review of General Semantics · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBeaverHistoryCharacter (mathematics)Media studiesSociologyPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Are you afraid of word beaver? Would you be horrified if someone called you an eager beaver? What would you think if you heard someone with a British accent make reference to a person beavering about? Honestly, when you hear or read word beaver, what comes to mind? Is it cute, furry animal known for building dams? Is it sitcom from golden age of television, Leave It to Beaver? Is it inexplicably named Samuel J. Gopher character from Disney's animated adaptation of A. A. Milne's Winnie Pooh (and let's leave topic of pooh for another occasion). Or might it be popular 1990s cartoon series seen on cable television's Nickelodeon channel, Angry Beavers? Or do you have a dirty mind? reason I bring this up is a news story out of Canada, which United Press International (UPI) headlined Forces Magazine Name Change. (1) report notes that publishers of periodical that was known for ninety years as magazine decided to change its name to Canada's History of online pornography and spam filters. You might consider this to be a case of Internet scapegoating, but it is not without precedent. Back in 2001, when spam filters were not as prevalent as they are today, an American institution of higher learning, College, changed its name to Arcadia University. Let me quote from history section of Wikipedia entry on this school: The school was founded in Beaver, Pennsylvania, in 1853 as Female Seminary [boldface in original]. (2) Yes, that's what it says. Why? What were you thinking? And yes, there is a town, actually a borough of in Pennsylvania, situated on River, and located in County. In fact, it's county seat, and there's nothing funny about that, either. Anyway, wiki entry goes on to note that 1872 it had attained collegiate status, under auspices of Methodist Episcopal Church, and was named College [boldface in original again]. (3) So, what about more recent name change? Well, read on: In July 2001, upon attaining university status, College officially changed its name to Arcadia University. It was thought that a new name would emphasize school's position as one of top small institutions of higher learning on East Coast, and would cement its change in designation from college to university. decision was also made in part to shed its association with former commonly derided name. As then-president Bette Landman noted, [The name] too often elicits ridicule in form of derogatory remarks pertaining to rodent, TV show Leave It to and vulgar reference to female anatomy. (4) Bette's frank explanation was included in a news story written by Ron Todt, archived at ABCnews.com, and entitled Beaver College Announces New Name. Interestingly, article says that the decision was announced just after midnight at a surprise pajama party for students, who were rounded up from residence halls with less than an hour's notice. (5) No comment on that, please. After quoting President Landman, Todt continues: College has appeared on David Letterman's Top 10 list. Conan O'Brien and Howard Stern have made jokes about it. And when Saturday Night Live writers invented an annoying film critic for a recent sketch, they made him a representative of College campus radio. college's own research shows school appeals to 30 percent fewer prospective students solely because of name. And problems worsened with rise of since some Web filters intended to screen out sexually explicit material blocked access to College Web site. (6) So, maybe we should be applauding magazine for holding out as long as it did. Returning to UPI story, Deborah Morrison, president of Canada's National History Society and publisher of history periodical, was quoted as saying: To be perfectly blunt about it, 'The Beaver' was an impediment on Internet, she said. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,623

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,002
Communication savante0,0080,011
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1860,219

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueETC.: A Review of General SemanticsMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207