MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1591826745

International PhDs Will Drive Innovation into the Future

2011· article· en· W1591826745 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch-Technology Management · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueBiomedical and Engineering Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGlobeChinaScience and engineeringWork (physics)Engineering educationPolitical scienceManagementEngineeringEconomic growthEconomicsEngineering managementEngineering ethicsPsychologyMechanical engineeringLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Higher education is booming around the globe. In China alone, the number of colleges and universities has more than doubled in the past decade. And it's easy to see the thought process behind the trend, says Maresi Nerad, founder and director of the Center for Research and Innovation in Graduate Education (CIRGE) at the University of Washington in Seattle. kind of thinking that has inspired many countries to invest in higher education starts with 'Where does innovation come from?' From ideas. 'Who produces those ideas?' It's PhDs- specifically PhDs in engineering and the sciences. The United States is losing its advantage in this key indicator. Although the nation still leads in raw numbers of STEM graduate degrees awarded each year, it will likely be surpassed in the next few years by China, whose numbers have rocketed up, from about 3,000 natural sciences and engineering doctoral degrees in 1993 to about 23,000 in 2006, not far off the nearly 30,000 science and engineering PhDs produced that same year in the United States, according to the National Science Foundation's Science and Engineering Indicators 2010 . Overall U.S. numbers have been holding steady, but a growing percentage of PhDs, and particularly science and engineering PhDs, are awarded to international students. In engineering, two-thirds of U.S. PhDs were awarded to foreign nationals in 2006 according to the NSF's Survey of Earned Doctorates, a growing percentage of whom return to their home countries to live, work, and innovate. Of course, some will stay in the country where they are educated-and that's exactly why Canada, Japan, and the United Kingdom have increased their recruiting efforts. The full importance of science and engineering PhDs in spurring innovation and securing U.S. leadership in the decades to come is well outlined in Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5 , a 2010 report issued by the National Academy of Sciences as a review of the current status of issues addressed in the 2005 report, Rising Above the Gathering Storm . The new report, which surveys a host of issues affecting U.S. competitiveness, particularly focuses on the education system. The report strongly suggests, alarmingly, that unless the U.S. K-12 education system does a radical turnaround, the only substantial growth market for PhDs in the near term is to be found in international students: getting them here and plugging them into U.S. institutions that develop new and applied knowledge. In that 2010 report, the Gathering Storm writers suggested a number of U.S. policy changes that could build the stream of international PhD students. Some of those proposed changes: The U.S. should include international students in consideration for national funding of PhD fellowships, improve visa processing and provide preferential visas to STEM students, offer a one-year visa extension to STEM PhDs after graduation, provide citizenship preference to graduates, and remove other barriers to keeping foreign students here that have made their way into U.S. immigration law and policy since 9/11. Changes shouldn't stop at the policy level. We also need to make international students feel more welcome. Campuses should become more like global villages, nurturing more interaction between the visiting student and the local population. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,884
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,282

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle