Conservation across Borders: Biodiversity in an Interdependent World
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Review: Conservation Across Borders: Biodiversity in an Interdependent World By Charles C. Chester Reviewed by A.M. Mannion University of Reading, UK Charles C. Chester. Conservation Across Borders: Biodiversity in an Interdependent World. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 2006. 262pp. ISBN: 1-55963-611-4, US pbk Alkaline paper. $US 29.95. Biodiversity loss is one of the major environmental issues of the 21st century. The conservation of species and ecosystems is difficult under the best of circumstances but where regional or national borders are involved the task requires even more effort. In North America, the mainly straightline boundaries separating the USA from Mexico in the south and Canada in the North were drawn with political and not ecological motives. Conservation problems associated with these boundaries are the substance of this book and are illustrated by reference to two initiatives: the International Sonoran Desert Alliance (ISDA) and the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative (Y2Y). Following an introduction to the general problem and the specific programmes, Chester's book moves into an analysis of the many interpretations of the term 'transborder', and a brief review of historical efforts at transborder conservation such as the proposed Peace Parks of the of the early 1900s in Europe and North America. The many international initiatives have various names, the most widely accepted being Transboundary Protected Areas (TBPAs). Their advantages and disadvantages, successes and failures, best and worst practices are examined. A major example discussed is the Man and Biosphere Programme (MAB), established in the late 1960s, which recognized conservation needs and the need to reconcile them with society's needs, and instigated the development of an international network of Biosphere Reserves to preserve representative areas of the world's biodiversity. The goals, ethics and practices of MAB influenced ISDA and Y2Y, both ambitious projects embracing substantial areas, land managers with varying economic and ecological goals as well as different national governments. Details of the ISDA occupy the next 80 pages. Its official designation occurred in 1993 but it emerged from earlier MAB efforts in Mexico and the USA, which emerged from even earlier protected areas. Biology and geography are just two facets of a complex land area that experiences rapid urban growth, cultural variation, different legal systems, migration problems and drug smuggling. ISDA itself has experienced rifts within its ruling body and shifts in policy from an emphasis on land management to environmental education and community outreach programmes. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle