Procedures for Community Based Parametric Design and Making
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The expanding interest in parametric models of design in both academic and professional circles has led to an explosion of innovation in production methods geared towards engaging these emerging ways of conceiving projects. Simultaneously there has been an equal intensification in the development of tools to facilitate the growth of an on-demand maker culture. From low cost 3D printers and laser cutters to large scale versions of the same, there is a growing technological infrastructure to support the “seamless” flow of information from its digital to form to a material one. What is in many cases lacking are methods to engage non-experts interested in participating in this milieu. How does one without experience in best practices for digital production, begin to engage in this design process or at least begin to be exposed to its potentials? This paper documents three projects explicitly designed to engage this question in the form of community based design build projects. Each of these projects follows the methodology of a component based system in which individual components are informed by localized conditions to produce an emerging formal response. Projects that engage in this method of component based articulation and assembly are too numerous to mention, but the approach has been engaged with semi-expert student teams in our Faculty by visiting designers Andrew Kudless, Marc Fornes, Alvin Huang and others (Fig 1.1) to produce a series of highly articulated installations. Engaging non-expert members of the broader community in these projects was severely limited by their lack of expertise in the digital tools used to design and produce these projects. Figure 1.1 Expert Workshop Fabrications from workshops lead by Marc Fornes, Andrew Kudless and Alvin Huang. In order to engage a broader group of makers, design consumers and community groups we designed three projects that would engage the public at a number of levels in the production of parametrically generated build projects. Figure 1.2 Paraseating bench for pop-up park in Calgary, Canada Paraseating ( Fig. 1.2) is a project in which we designed a single assembly of components that could be aggregated by a group of people to assemble benches for a park that take on a range of ergonomic positions. Figure 1.3 Cellular Phone Booth Cellular Phone Booth (Fig. 1.3) was a project in which the basic assembly and folding methods for the materials it is made of where embedded into a parametric model and manipulated by users through the selection of images that reconfigured its size, shape and density. The paper includes descriptions of the levels of control exercised by both the expert designer and novice design-makers, discusses the issues around the topic of community engagement and education through design and presents a series of case studies that evaluate the efficacy of these techniques for wider spread use by designers interested in engaging the public in parametric design and making.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».