Graduating a More Confident Pharmacist: Applying the Medical Model of Training
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ihave a dream — that some day clinical training for pharmacy undergraduate students will parallel that of medical students. In my own undergraduate years, I never saw a patient — or another health care professional, for that matter. Fortunately, pharmacy undergraduate training has progressed since then, but the process has been long and slow, beginning with visits to clinical sites and observation of pharmacists in their roles, an experience in which no responsibilities were delegated to the student. Now, each student completes clinical clerkships of several weeks to months, during which they are integrated into the management teams caring for patients in hospitals, clinics, and community pharmacies. Unfortunately, however, such opportunities are generally offered at the very end of undergraduate training. As such, the student goes directly from primarily a setting of large classes and few expectations (except for the occasional problem-based learning discussion), to a setting of patient assignments and interactions, as well as small-group discussions within the health care team, with expectations of acquiring and discussing new knowledge, and applying it to assigned patients under close supervision. No wonder these pharmacy students appear to have, and sometimes admit to, an insufficient degree of confidence in providing any level of pharmaceutical care. Yet these students are only weeks to months away from graduating and becoming licensed pharmacists. My 30 years of participating in clinical education for pharmacy and medical trainees has given me a unique view of how our respective professional faculties teach and, more important, train their prospective graduates. Medical training introduces students to the responsibility of taking care of patients in the first undergraduate year. This experiential approach progresses, such that thirdand fourth-year medical students spend all of their time in the clinical setting, primarily in teaching hospitals and academic family practice units, accepting increasing responsibility and acquiring practical clinical knowledge. This undergraduate education culminates in, at a minimum, a 2-year postgraduate residency for family practitioners and several additional years for general internists and specialists. The General Medical Council of Great Britain has recently recommended increased and earlier patient contact for medical students in that country. 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,013 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».