Policy Initiatives Towards the Third Sector in International Perspective. Edited by Benjamin Gidron and Michal Bar
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The third sector has come to play an increasingly significant role, not only for international development assistance policies in developing countries, but also in developed countries as part of everyday domestic politics.It is to these national processes of policy initiatives that this new book, edited by Benjamin Gidron and Michael Bar, is devoted.Policy Initiatives Towards the Third Sector in International Perspective helps us understand a policy actor, the third sector, that has become increasingly visible and influential, yet has been subject to multiple interpretations and misguided assessments.Overall, the third sector has been viewed in a sort of dual manner: either through a paternalist, condescending lens, which has prevailed mostly in poor countries or whenever the sector is rather incipient, or through a "managerialist" lens, pretending to be an apolitical and socially neutral force, concerned more with the private sector standards and trends.Challenging these biased and incomplete approaches, Gidron and Bar present us with this new book that compiles policy initiatives toward the third sector in eight countries (Canada, the U.S., Germany, Japan, Ireland, Hungary, Israel, and the U.K.) over the last three decades.This research addresses the political processes aimed at third sector organizations, based on the analytical framework laid down by Kingdon (1995) and that of Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1999), to refute conventional models of policy design and implementation.The main issues addressed in each case study are the conditions under which policy change took place, the "windows of opportunity" that opened up, and how different policy players exploited these opportunities with various degrees of success.The key argument throughout the book is that these policy initiatives are complex, uncertain, and unforeseeable, resulting in unanticipated and/or undesired outcomes.Such initiatives are developed in processes that are permanently affected by disputed leadership and interpretations, and thus do not fit the usual approaches for policy analysis.Building on an actor-identification exercise, not only collective actors but also individuals-epitomized in the figure of the "policy entrepreneur"-recurring dilemmas and conflicts are highlighted between the third sector and government and private sector players.The ensuing lack of confidence, divergent expectations, and lack of commitment between various agencies are dealt with using the tools of organizational theory and discourse analysis.At the end of the volume, these theoretical approaches and the observations from each chapter form the basis of six theses on the evolution of policies and politics of the third sector.Vol. 2, No 1 Spring / Printemps 2011
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».