The Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Physical Activity Among Adolescents
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Many Canadian youth are inactive (Active Healthy Kids Canada, 2009). Socioeconomic status (SES) is one factor that influences youth physical activity (PA) levels; however, the factors involved in this relationship are not well understood. Given that numerous quantitative studies suggest there is a positive relationship between SES and PA among adolescents, but offer little insight into why the given relationship exists, the purpose of the current thesis is to study the factors that influence the relationship between SES and PA among youth aged 12–14 years through a qualitative lens.\nMethods: Low (n = 2) and high SES (n = 3) parents and community support liaisons (n = 15) took part in one-on-one interviews to provide insight into how various SES indicators (i.e., income, education, and occupation) influence adolescent PA. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded into meaning units, and put into themes that related to smaller sub-themes.\nResults: The three major themes were access, time, and awareness and related to the indicators of income, occupation, and education, respectively. For each theme specific sub-themes were identified. Access is related to one’s income which impacts adolescent PA by determining whether a parent/family: 1) has money available to cover the direct costs of PA programs, 2) has transportation and travel options available for PA programming, 3) is able to meet basic needs with limited stress, and 4) is eligible to access subsidies or low cost programs. Time is the theme related to one’s occupation which impacts one’s employment schedule. Awareness is related to both formal and informal education which impacts one’s: 1) knowledge of the importance of PA and, 2) access to resources and exposure to PA, and 3) knowledge of subsidies and low cost programs. Other social-ecological factors also emerged from the data.\nConclusion: The relationship between SES and PA among adolescents is complex; however, the qualitative nature of this study allowed an in-depth analysis of participant’s experiences in order to better understand the factors that influence this relationship. The current results provide insight into factors that can be targeted in future PA interventions aiming to equalize PA opportunities between adolescents of varying levels of SES. Although income is related to the greatest number of sub-themes, targeting factors based on occupation and education is also warranted.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle