MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1597279463

The Impact of Gas Price Trends on Vehicle Type Choice

2010· article· en· W1597279463 sur OpenAlex
Mansoureh Jeihani, Soheil Sibdari

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of economics and economic education research · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrice elasticity of demandEconomicsPetroleumFuel efficiencyConsumption (sociology)BusinessEconomyMicroeconomicsEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT When shopping for cars, customers consider several factors, including comfort, safety, and cost. Due to recent fluctuations in gas prices, fuel economy has become increasingly critical among these factors. As a result, the auto industry is experiencing new demand patterns among their vehicle inventory: demand for high-consumption vehicles (i.e. SUVs) is down, and demand for gas-efficient cars (i.e. hybrids) is up. Quantifying the impact of gas prices on vehicle choice is the subject of many studies in the literature. Those studies have typically investigated the short-term effects of gas price changes on customer behavior. This article addresses the impact of fuel cost fluctuations on customers' vehicle choice, a long-term decision, through the analysis of U.S. automobile sales data from 1990 to 2007. KEYWORDS: Transportation Economics, Traveler Behavior, Gas Price, Demand Elasticity. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.) INTRODUCTION The cost of energy is an important factor for all sectors of the economy - government, private sectors, and consumers. The recent fluctuations in energy cost have altered the decisions and behavior of many groups. Among all sectors, transportation accounts for nearly 67 percent of all petroleum consumption in the United States. From 1977-2002, the transportation sector's petroleum usage grew by 35 percent, but overall national petroleum use only increased by 7 percent (EIA, 2007). This indicates that overall non-transportation petroleum usage declined during this period while transportation usage more than doubled the net national increase. Additionally, transportation distillate use (highway, rail, and marine) constituted the fastestgrowing element of national petroleum use. American passenger-miles have more than quadrupled since 1950, far exceeding the population growth rate. Since transportation costs are dependent on fuel prices, the auto industry needs to study customer responses to fuel cost increases. Modeling customer choice and providing the vehicles consumers prefer helps the auto industry to improve their market share, and makes the economy less susceptible to the global oil market shocks. This in turn allows the economy to reduce the oil dependency and respond to fuel shortages more efficiently. Two major oil price increases have occurred in the U.S. history: in the 1970s, and since 2004. After the first increase, people altered their shopping and recreational trips, but avoided altering their automobile trips to work. After oil prices dropped in the 1980s, household vehicle trips increased, primarily for non-work trips (Loeta, 2007). While there are many studies about the long-term and short-term effects of oil price increase of the 1970s, few studies have been performed about recent fuel price fluctuations. Haire and Machemehl (2006) analyzed five cities in the United States and found that most transit systems have experienced a ridership growth of approximately 0.09 percent for each additional cent of fuel price. In a 2005 survey of 500 residents of Austin, Texas, Bomberg and Kockelman (2007) found that travelers reduce their overall driving and/or chain their trips together to cope with high gas prices. They also reported that households drove their most fuelefficient vehicles more when gasoline prices increased in 2005. Goodwin et al. (2004) reviewed empirical studies since 1990 and found that a 10 percent increase in the real price of fuel produces: a 1.0 percent reduction in vehicle miles traveled; a 2.5 percent reduction in fuel consumption; a 1.5 percent increase in the fuel efficiency of vehicles; and a less than 1.0 percent decrease in net vehicle ownership. El tony (1993) attempted to model gasoline demand for Canada. He demonstrated through regression models that in response to a gas price increase, households planning to buy a new car either postpone their vehicle purchases or buy a more fuel -efficient car, and households that already own a car drive fewer miles. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,616
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,383

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,360
Écart entre enseignants0,324 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle