Let the Child Decide: Surgical Intervention After Parental Consent Should No Longer Be Considered the Best Option for Children with Intersex Conditions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Not that I would have necessarily kept my phalloclit 1 But I would have liked to have been able to choose for myself.I would have liked to have grown up in the body I was born with But physically, someone else made the decision of what and who I would be "be" before I even knew who and what I "was" .[The doctors] used surgical force to make my appearance coincide with the medical and societal standards of a "normal" female body, thereby attempting to permanently jettison any trace of intersexuality. 2Each year, a small number of infants are born with conditions that cause them to have reproductive anatomy (external or internal) that is not clearly identified as male or female.Currently in most of these situations, the child's parents decide soon after birth if they would like their child to undergo surgery to make his genitals appear more like "normal" male or female genitals.Since the early 1970's, it has been widely accepted in the United States that early surgical intervention to normalize the child's genitals is the best option for an intersexed child and that the child's parents should be able to consent to such a procedure since the young child is obviously not able to consent to surgery himself.This paper will examine the current standard of 1 M. Morgan Holmes, the Director of the Canadian Chapter of Intersex Society of North America and author of this quote defines the term "phalloclit" in his 1995 paper Queer Cut Bodies: Intersexuality & Homophobia in Medical Practice: "I have created this term to describe tissue which is not exactly a penis but also not a 'proper' clitoris.As a penis it will be considered too small, as a clitoris, too large.Doctor's usually refer to such an organ as a phallus until it has been pared down to be an acceptable clitoris.Even when present on an 'XY' individual with no endocrine, gonadal or karyotype disorders, doctors will not call it a penis for fear that the parents will resist its reconstruction (amputation) as a clitoris which is its likely destiny."http://www.usc.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».