MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1598877839 · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11115.x

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens

2012· review· en· W1598877839 sur OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Ng, Aamer Mahmud, Brenda Bass, Michael Brundage

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Urology · 2012
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLymphovascular invasionProstatectomyMedicineProstate cancerCochrane LibraryOncologyBiochemical recurrenceMeta-analysisInternal medicineOdds ratioProstate-specific antigenUrologyGynecologyCancerMetastasis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Study Type – Prognosis (systematic review) Level of Evidence 1a What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Prognostic factors such as serum PSA, tumor T stage, and Gleason grading are commonly used to predict disease progression and mortality in prostate cancer and to guide treatment decision‐making. These markers are combined to define risk strata that are commonly accepted in practice. Despite the assignment of patients to a specific risk stratum (e.g. intermediate‐risk disease), however, within‐stratum survival duration varies considerably, suggesting that many other factors, including lymphovascular invasion (LVI) may influence prognosis. LVI is currently a recognized prognostic factor in the management of some cancers (e.g. in early‐stage breast cancer) and prostate cancer is known to spread via lymphatic channels. Furthermore, the reporting of microscopic lymphovascular invasion is now considered part of the standard pathologic report of prostatectomy specimens. Nevertheless, scientific studies in this area have produced conflicting conclusions regarding the utility of LVI as a prognostic indicator in prostate cancer. This paper provides a comprehensive review and synthesis of the recent literature. Although a number of studies examining the role of LVI as an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer have been reported, the characteristics, quality and results of these studies vary considerably. The value of using LVI as a prognostic factor in prostate cancer remains unclear. This study provides a systematically‐performed synthesis of the results of recent research including lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in the multivariate analyses of potential prostate cancer prognostic factors. Not only do we report on the results of these studies, we assess the heterogeneity of the study populations, disease characteristics, and quality of the studies. Ultimately, we determined that meta‐analysis of the existing data is not possible, and thus, there is no ‘best estimate’ of the strength of association between LVI status and disease recurrence after prostatectomy. Most studies, but not all, reveal a weak or statistically insignificant association between LVI status and recurrence. We therefore conclude with a recommendation to clinicians that they should not overweight the importance of LVI status on clinical prognostication. The use of LVI status as a strong predictor of clinical outcomes is not recommended. OBJECTIVES To synthesize the results of studies including lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in the multivariate analyses of potential prostate cancer prognostic factors. To determine the role of LVI as an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a comprehensive systematic literature review of studies examining the association between LVI in prostatectomy specimens and prostate cancer recurrence. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Review of Effects (DARE) and Google Scholar were searched from January 2000 to February 2009. The primary outcome of interest was biochemical recurrence measured by serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). RESULTS One thousand two hundred and forty‐eight papers met our search criteria. Of these, 19 articles meeting our selection criteria reported results of a multivariate analysis to evaluate LVI as an independent prognostic factor of biochemical recurrence. Eleven (58%) of these studies concluded that LVI was an independent prognostic factor. Significant heterogeneity in the study population, disease characteristics and quality of the studies prevented meta‐analysis of the results. In the nine studies in which the magnitude of independent association of LVI with recurrence was reported, it ranged from an odds ratio or relative risk of 1.37 to 4.39. CONCLUSIONS The existing literature is conflicting and of insufficient homogeneity to definitively establish LVI as an important independent prognostic factor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer prostatectomy specimens. Additional adequately powered studies are required to determine the clinical value of reports of LVI involvement. In the meantime, the use of LVI status as an independent prognostic factor for clinical prognostication and medical decision making is not recommended.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,047

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,056
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0110,012
Bibliométrie0,0050,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations33
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish Journal of UrologyMême sujetProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207